From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?B?R8O2a3R1xJ8=?= Kayaalp Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes for emacs 28 Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 10:54:57 +0300 Message-ID: <87h7s3tooe.fsf@gkayaalp.com> References: <87y2lkb6kb.fsf@gmail.com> <9A4FA038-CCFD-45DF-8B57-E348AFF951D9@gmail.com> <87sgbsb0eb.fsf@gmail.com> <87h7s6c31d.fsf@gmail.com> <87mu1xrjqw.fsf@gkayaalp.com> <48ed4897-356c-4669-a330-1fdb5d65402b@default> <83lfhhijbl.fsf@gnu.org> <871rj9uz12.fsf@gkayaalp.com> <87wo10tzga.fsf@gkayaalp.com> <87mu1wt476.fsf@gkayaalp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10927"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 28.0.50 Cc: casouri@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, ghe@sdf.org, =?utf-8?B?R8O2a3R1xJ8=?= Kayaalp , eliz@gnu.org, yuri.v.khan@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, tecosaur@gmail.com To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 12 09:55:51 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kH0Ny-0002gd-LG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 09:55:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50828 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kH0Nx-0001k2-LT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 03:55:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kH0NL-0000iE-Td for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 03:55:11 -0400 Original-Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.201]:53275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kH0NJ-00066O-SQ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 03:55:11 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 149.0.50.61 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [149.0.50.61]) (Authenticated sender: self@gkayaalp.com) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27C441BF208; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 07:54:58 +0000 (UTC) In-reply-to: Received-SPF: none client-ip=217.70.183.201; envelope-from=self@gkayaalp.com; helo=relay8-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/12 03:55:06 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255276 Archived-At: On 2020-09-12 00:40 +03, Stefan Kangas wrote: > Sounds reasonable. But given that Lars had some reservations about > doing this at all, perhaps we could just leave it at that. See his > separate email about this. Saw the message, yes, reasonable indeed. I=E2=80=99ve tried to make it as = clear as possible that it=E2=80=99s just a suggestion for the greater good of the community, but it coming from a place of =E2=80=98authority=E2=80=99, can d= efinitely be read that way. IMO, let=E2=80=99s see how upstreams respond, tho. If it=E2=80=99s positiv= e, we talk again and /maybe/ continue, if it=E2=80=99s negative, we stop. -- =C4=B0. G=C3=B6ktu=C4=9F Kayaalp / @cadadr / pgp: 024C 30DD 597D 142B 49AC 40EB 465C D949 B101 2427