From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs | Pipeline #8399 has failed for master | ee0e259e Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 13:42:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87h7nf4twj.fsf@gmx.de> References: <5feaf98365b55_3f903d428113941@emba.gnu.org.mail> <87o8ica9xp.fsf@gmx.de> <87pn2s35a2.fsf@gmail.com> <87ft3oa4pz.fsf@gmx.de> <8735zo9ui7.fsf@gmx.de> <87h7nw39gg.fsf@gmail.com> <87im8b3jo6.fsf@gmx.de> <87lfd6cld0.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34308"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Emacs developers To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 17 13:44:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l17QR-0008nP-GA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 13:44:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50268 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l17QP-0000wN-8P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 07:44:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48478) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l17Nk-0000QL-1Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 07:42:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:53383) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l17Nh-0006Rs-WF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 07:42:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1610887326; bh=4s5oOAq41fO2nwufvuYMA40pKdpCec8pBa9c/r2Ig/o=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=GEUXR3d6wpSp7ORZFfql2W/r5I1zqT276f0yaWKaths+qWWo8Q1vuojlMzNJpsZLR vKxpDt9BcP2fysNsmn7mpU5zUjZbwGKUcny6YduSpCFx/Ch59Pt2v6RYo4uBxFYcoK /PAKet8iwsn0kKNSqAgfQQ86lOn/Gcg1CgXflPA0= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([212.86.58.136]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mnpru-1lqMRL3uSg-00pJ5B; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 13:42:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Philipp Stephani's message of "Sun, 17 Jan 2021 11:37:02 +0100") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:P/ZEF2hXtBEMDJpvJM4QjWzv+uHy83v4D5V6sBqYp+bPkxEIb7I /q4gA9NEHv+3REi8r3pClu3IaDK26Ut/WuY5IVPRK+Xu38nJ6gHPCrlVPinBFq6Cjdy6Qei qOPz5r4WZECZ1RLG1CyG4uwpDdo2HlSu3MkFZTo9xWOdoJoEU2DKnU3SuVgGkmwQSUcX3mK 7nbLJdCLVEIVIk+u4XGAQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:EzNoaoEh2K4=:veABCw+uBKZYyhjPoHswES hNECWLtoSXdiJUEjh5sWEpYvufNhVE/avfYYoEwL6kXAyaFE6akP4J9OgCztTogEWPigq4kLW Y2G8TzoHGesItP5NyruzKu593maM1XSHslm4jf+ESB/XmgJA8Zh8M13BGPweUSbTTChS/HGsL c1gXtCbBnIL9h9ODPBLfnDsy9VQBkFX2T8oskMdqPfRkAtTiDP/H+WwH8ZNo7AQmn1bsAS2aH LWFy8TsIZV+RWfPLVhFwV2X9s9epXAdfQn/RBzQCipi0e2dMb9N17NkJXoZ1DPalFyacqsTae OzwJ6ehyWkxMwwWI0tnTzm+IJtwbmMpDu2zpbXjtvxuxhZmDaYBmszycLxHKvqlDOOeC1lSS6 GTBf5ZWyrb4tT590S6sNESk8blAJs2hCaWmc/a84cvub3s+J7lg48i/h93XxdWP4QpNpH95nV NExIkhyz2EyPzLdF4vUWF3clw8RAGgcGUVj8YYjsBMyRyyp2ATQ8+094cBXTJUc/M7jCyogi/ rdahdHOULDurkqhaaArxYovDmuYXcfGxz5Uc/BpygHA2RJZIvQujW/cVc7mSGDZ7U3L4ocgxi b/9+vvBTQSpG0FbX0EboH5fjV0Q0ia1WM2SULZwGqwP1Qg92sMT09zpTCU3ZUydqdwJf0y0bu 20IUvYUuvspeGWa539oNYqJz6D/tIOhkL4MjvZ80BSJMIhlz5WLG/CvW2hL5lezg8agzQbBeI KtRyEa0Eas2regdHh6ZC+rxkAn6GG9DnmB9qF+wPgcL8dN5LQWJP8avo5mHAyl2RMm3z6c0V Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.20; envelope-from=michael.albinus@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263118 Archived-At: Philipp Stephani writes: Hi Philipp, > You're right in that (while (accept-process-output PROC 0)) doesn't > result in a busy wait, yes. However, since accept-process-output > returns nil in that case, it wouldn't wait at all. But these tests > (e.g. process-tests-stderr-filter) are clearly intended to wait for > process exit; they even contain assertions that the process has > exited. > I'm still convinced that (while (accept-process-output PROC)) is the > only correct way to wait for PROC to finish (see the "Accepting > Output" Info node). I believe, (while (accept-process-output PROC 0)) is the proper way to read pending output from an exited process. That's all. Best regards, Michael.