From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thierry Volpiatto Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: updating async on elpa Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 15:37:51 +0000 Message-ID: <87h7jm5u7w.fsf@posteo.net> References: <874kfom16w.fsf@posteo.net> <871rarn69c.fsf@posteo.net> <87y2czll5a.fsf@posteo.net> <87o8dvty56.fsf@posteo.net> <87zgxf5zyz.fsf@posteo.net> <87lf8zrqym.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39980"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 01 17:51:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lcrts-000AIl-9S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 17:51:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34700 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcrtr-0002nt-DP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 11:51:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcrt6-0002Or-Ov for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 11:50:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:51321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcrt4-00028U-87 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 11:50:36 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F00E8240028 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 17:50:31 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1619884232; bh=GlU0L81igwaEuVNClhtZmuzyhZO3Ac3ah4Q9Q94j3Ow=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=PUVpQIC8Gt3CGz3PqN15X7bt5UmCNOCgANtfJPYgDcKnaCW7o4hkgBC9D/KcW/ix9 zQpqHg3vHWsqRsw7BEk2Ia5otKgbaGssTUjSDfPJRo4uWw63NyPhoCQPzQS/j4NUiE jRnbxtZCMdUt7KDNFqnMN/dqi/nou0ZMFF0RcyXZwCJELUh6E3EVgcAvdH7nGLwosT lTZ/FTTTaSK1tWtHNUmLYwJpN97mgi49RbbCyZBs+eIGE75+XBREClEnoiHDj3+LAY seq+mkGBlCLsQh4WQ7JXfBN5fav4g3EjMXSr02VvecNH0W3ZuuN9FE7TNS2AHo0vEQ gPh6USiUtlRxQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4FXYbp3S9pz6tm4; Sat, 1 May 2021 17:50:30 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=thievol@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268720 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Stefan again, now emacs-async master is compliant with elpa (package-requires, no pkg.el file), so now I can push from master to elpa, my remote called elpa is pointing to "me@git.sv$gnu.org:/srv/git/emacs/elpa.git", can I push safely with git push elpa master:refs/heads/externals/async? Thanks. Stefan Monnier writes: > [[PGP Encrypted Part:OK]] >> Yes, the name I use -elpa- is bad, > > Really? It sounds like a genuinely natural and intuitive choice to me ;-) > >> but yes a repository per repo would be great, in github organizations >> allow having one repo per package like in helm organization. > > I know it's more traditional and has its advantages, but currently it's > not really an option. > >> What about ((emacs "24.4")) we don't care of 24.3, we are at 27.2 now so >> very far from 24.3. > > ((emacs "24.4")) would work, yes. Whether that's better than > ((emacs "24.3") (nadvice "0.3")) or even ((cl-lib "0.5") (nadvice "0.3")) > is for the maintainers of Async to decide ;-) > >>> - The `async-pkg.el` which is absent on `elpa` and present on `master`. >>> Do we actually need it on `master`? >> IIRC yes, Melpa needs it. > > Why would it matter, since it's on GNU ELPA anyway? > > > Stefan > > > > > [[End of PGP Encrypted Part]] =2D-=20 Thierry --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQHHBAEBCgAxFiEEI9twfRN7r3nig/xwDsVtFB0W75MFAmCNeMMTHHRoaWV2b2xA cG9zdGVvLm5ldAAKCRAOxW0UHRbvk6xzC/9mdnsNv3pfGhccljhaB0x3l9Tv3t+u M4Yd6tnGl51E64lNcL71JQnOJ7qxbLd+406YuiYjq3RiygoYfisKW0IogNb3tIyq TAns14vmpvPwpYX/0wPpjgUxd5BZiAnx41JMMw/yqE1CIyWNVB3Ucj6cx1DItDOI hFDVjwI0wi0q1FmbY/G0/lMP+XMHDcvxZgVb5ql0vCBSIoLrCzXREM2usMoxWEL5 smhLepCRA4C2p9r+7l972rshyFv8wckp06FCkNCnwp1iyBdunm7Ny899Tz8U8Mp/ MyUr01Dy2MyJDUvdGurQ3NxQ1gle/Q2pUCICSyGc479ZJuCLfhi//4HCLjtjcJqU 4TnqfXlUf0Y0LQhBgADyBbo1BARhcfquB5hj7agsb/RnZl8uj+6F/xhLLF4t7Bes KtRC+0hICE8kVKTrYGT5WTexDNvCO2/Dfpx0X5M57XALssVuyh612Iawhz0dfyN0 bxiJ6+3vQ83km/fb/j//zIKAFnUCylWQ2XU= =nPHp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--