From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Better emoji support Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:40:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87h7efk5c3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <834kd2cypw.fsf@gnu.org> <87zguuttbm.fsf@gmail.com> <8335smcxx6.fsf@gnu.org> <87v95itsc4.fsf@gmail.com> <831r86cxdy.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6kgejp0.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnnkpjj9.fsf@gmail.com> <3E0155F6-D681-4443-A1D9-472D1836168D@traduction-libre.org> <87bl4rnyoe.fsf@gmail.com> <877dffnwf5.fsf@gmail.com> <875yuzciaf.fsf@gmail.com> <87tuijm9uy.fsf@gmail.com> <87lf3v2dz4.fsf@gmail.com> <87ilywl8tx.fsf@gmail.com> <877dfcz6zu.fsf@gmail.com> <83mto73mem.fsf@gnu.org> <87ee9jhint.fsf@gmail.com> <838rzr3fhm.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5666"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 20 10:42:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mSEsa-0001G2-OQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:42:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33412 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSEsY-0005sd-Tc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 04:42:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSEqp-0003n4-RU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 04:40:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::330]:52120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSEqn-0004Hg-Cr; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 04:40:34 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id y132so12518202wmc.1; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 01:40:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version; bh=Xi75uRvxjzlgqoBCdSMXQMjSmQ25NH1+sgnwGW6yYs8=; b=iYnhrdyu/bV+h1ZIoX7bgwYZ0rBm35QpfFiJiB52rn0d4FJLbGRBQDDuMmYDwqF2xm Pa9h1eVwljU/siWQZ5ldtcvKH1HKjH4svB5RHgAEqwBcBg6tj6Ijn6I73gLobhqzyVeA IJHcMtLo5C/lGwsf7yiyQzNFznRKDgwHnJnV9e7z/0VVZFhqpq2N9lV21HixusyIGsYQ VACKTnYPsmr2Y9UMzRgAwpo1ln2t8EGh2OQ0oy0dDT8NroOpReZ7fSoIkYkujmUk2Gjc CKmrYIPG/3i9oCr39F2v7DakFAJjr4Q/Mdybziqbl1jWcNxz8p6at3Pgcd9i88HkKlsP G/ew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version; bh=Xi75uRvxjzlgqoBCdSMXQMjSmQ25NH1+sgnwGW6yYs8=; b=i4PvCui5gprz4o1fLIzmnVREhppCThbeATH1YcgoIa+TPbwb4ooGbFfcEOQKnV27ft Kx4wrzHAhQotOQVFNfe49c3RPxTbGNGhQxIy+fIA/q5GzzPtAnQ7t3fV4CtPaJPQofGv iOvd1hz+wjLtKTTaNVHb3ubEDz2DK+3GJeuQ+qThm0TUKFil2Y/3TQBVdnJzcZ/DGqRi U6Hq+G8Va0mnc6CNH2LYr5M2MSS1iYbyBwepI4CwpVXI0daAlgoSInmGp4s8GhO1FSss Bj68al0Cpp21MWu12h+ezhGu996ER8UN0b8TBHzAhuS6luTHZ35D3mUcHAZB06aU+6mA 8MHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533B7pE9D/n5V9DVmqnhdqOcQfeYndX+Ux672MSb6CJf16tVeKIZ 2cpJ1eglvhQ3hxziFdjta9eM/Nh0f+Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzin3SxRnETTusWOtqaMMpT7Ve6tlUPLVL1vnyyWP1NXogd2MmqmDZVCDThKauCjnyMLWCweQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f405:: with SMTP id z5mr27836970wma.33.1632127230241; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 01:40:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h15sm14805848wrc.19.2021.09.20.01.40.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 20 Sep 2021 01:40:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <838rzr3fhm.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:53:09 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::330; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x330.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:275118 Archived-At: >>>>> On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:53:09 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >> IIUC Robert's tentative patch[1] gets us closer to The Right Thing, by >> making sure (char-table-range char-script-table C) is "emoji" iff C's >> Emoji_Presentation property is "Yes". Eli> IMO, that's what we want; the emoji sequences should be handled via Eli> composition-function-table, not via the fontset. The emoji sequences can be handled by composition, since the relevant codepoints will be from the 'emoji' script. But codepoints with Emoji_Presentation=No will still be 'symbol' or similar, so how can composition-function-table affect their font-selection? Robert --