From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Org mode and Emacs (was: Convert README.org to plain text README while installing package) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:43:25 +0800 Message-ID: <87h74jrdrm.fsf@localhost> References: <87bkv527p5.fsf@gmail.com> <835yld93w7.fsf@gnu.org> <877d5t0yrn.fsf@gmail.com> <87r140yuof.fsf@gmail.com> <875yl9e7zm.fsf@gmail.com> <83czfh12kp.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmjhghu2.fsf@localhost> <835yl910gp.fsf@gnu.org> <87wndndbhq.fsf@gmail.com> <874k0qbrhe.fsf@localhost> <877d5lwhbg.fsf@gmail.com> <87k09l4cs1.fsf@localhost> <835yl4vkvj.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtefwetq.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27780"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: eliz@gnu.org, theophilusx@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 17 08:48:09 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o25m4-00073b-OK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 08:48:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51524 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o25m3-0002jW-0E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 02:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54808) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o25gV-0008Pk-4V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 02:42:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]:46729) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o25gT-0000Hu-MV; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 02:42:22 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id l4so3264861pgh.13; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 23:42:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=00ORuhT/7vct7dA7DbYDNNgxyVZoxI1TmTAorRzR27E=; b=igzHSUxLizDHgupTfVRXt40a8rt0dj7OiXac5R2j9lDU8dJCXdkV7g2A5n7WHuZmtJ irZMSuDNZCkZVNGYfzyMRlIFUTLA7eMRToMds014Q+YEG/7ifXa4oX/fj3TVDgUSdGWw 0p5l/6l+FHNrd4D7xpxnCWOMTHq3CjvzaTvRUz5KU0bSG33xhH+JH2Tmih4p9xZ3bfYh F+19GW4cabS0rVPdSpwm+PMFRsaod/GRIx5dZ/Xyrt5njbV2iporYY0slmN+4fDPB2Yb +fPzMTVArrnXGpSW85pgK5eQKssc2lpip7HGJokWSgXr9tY8UBkSbT3/XlBJbgdJxVfm Hz4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=00ORuhT/7vct7dA7DbYDNNgxyVZoxI1TmTAorRzR27E=; b=ACD3k1ZWG29MyriZbg/WBmWYeS16t2+0WP+iOhdQzE4y3zX8v4FOeLt6hT42ZD848v e2W3K2h+X3Qaw7ylUQJD19gJeFHj8king0aXXxrL2QvjzjKLvYFDuXcgVGDT+ezH5ag1 LygpRgRGVvco0iSRwEKnx54uwqF7gT9MWUR6tv0TYPLZFHcZ/8ImJ/htRsdMS52pXks1 8zP/UZnAXbwfDd/o5kKZVsn3RWFSrcWY4FqQsoZeYJg9+CSeVhTRxyafzaEJ1jiQDm1i YrG2GagRkOn3jhNBkQNuOgjuts8GOdKEbXKdi9nqAqVqA/1zKF1/X/twiFn8DMd0my60 5w9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9jLk/jrJrTlIo1q6OlpC2MPFk4wpIsMyJoJaoN1iMtv/8w107e ZvT4sKvo0tNlcxYi5w25EgZ4O+X1slW6VILV X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1ufS5w7zxXrf8X8Z3Ke2vQajRN9IDL3/fqw+F6Tq7RkvN0k7sOMlyqR8cWL5VeA4K/p5/44Zg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:1a56:0:b0:405:28e3:e4fb with SMTP id a22-20020a631a56000000b0040528e3e4fbmr7942761pgm.16.1655448137226; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 23:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([66.154.105.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b14-20020a1709027e0e00b00167804a044fsm2738956plm.56.2022.06.16.23.42.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 16 Jun 2022 23:42:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::536; envelope-from=yantar92@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-x536.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:291275 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > > It would certainly help with development. For example, I did not look > > close into allowed markup nesting. File with tricky examples will be > > helpful as a benchmark for any attempted implementation. > > I don't know for certain that every possible nesting "does the right > thing". I do know that @var{} is used inside many other constructs. > By contrast, @dfn{} would not be nested inside or around other > contructs very much. @key can be nested inside @kbd, and it behaves > a little differently when nested. Thanks! I replied in a different thread, that includes Org ML in CC.