From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matt Armstrong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: noverlay branch Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:27:26 -0700 Message-ID: <87h70b4pap.fsf@rfc20.org> References: <87sfjzefvv.fsf@rfc20.org> <875ygt6gbj.fsf@rfc20.org> <87czb01r2o.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28822"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Emanuel Berg , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 10 18:41:29 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ohvqK-0007FZ-Tt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 18:41:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46268 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohvqJ-0002Aa-SW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:41:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35468) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohvcy-00060j-T2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:27:40 -0400 Original-Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:dc4:8::227]:43307) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohvcs-00015I-Hc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:27:39 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: matt@rfc20.org) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 807E620002; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 16:27:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rfc20.org; s=gm1; t=1665419250; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8FAnRWhO0p51gBzIg2AGK51Vp1WGhRKsiVJ7y5fNJzM=; b=k2SSapwnikGMafSKIm9kW5IQAP/RyeiEyjPquug7L8MxfoTGr5BJQnGodJYXCyVD/8OyqS wyURAHL0PZNU3FPQLWpzWisIi3HE1+vyObxKmaWdkIiMTivi0b/gNDXmvvPFxQ4J90Yf8X glyDr7TbuI3VroNbAXrJTosNMo4il8lOh/UVTuRp5HVSjRhHrHAKBgCPEhgnhazjArmC0N iTbEOiyJ/cz7s4W8YxBs2h2T8YM+acCFQVfYcI54d7dcGt4ayUUW8mLub/aUj0GMsFQOPP 3CYHylege4RqqhsFxnL5dHp5N8UeSOHmzXzeNN3oQmgVPg3ETLtGuqd0bRTs1w== Original-Received: from matt by naz with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ohvck-0083YZ-1q; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:27:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87czb01r2o.fsf@dataswamp.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:4b98:dc4:8::227; envelope-from=matt@rfc20.org; helo=relay7-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297385 Archived-At: Emanuel Berg writes: > Stefan Monnier wrote: > >>> In any case, I do have a new test for >>> tests/src/buffer-tests.el that crashes feature/noverlay >>> Emacs immediately, when ENABLE_CHECKING is on, in a spot in >>> itree.c having to do with offset inheritance. >> >> I tightened up a few things and the code now passes the >> tests without crashing any more. > > I know only of the byte-compiler and checkdoc > > https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-init/ide/pack-style.el > > If you have something more I want it please :) > > If we talk Elisp in general ... Hi Emanuel, for what it is worth I could not figure out how your response here pertains to this conversation. Have you replied and quoted the correct messages?