From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 12f63c18f6 1/2: Add new macro 'while-let' Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 09:26:59 +0000 Message-ID: <87h7045db0.fsf@posteo.net> References: <166436449368.11560.17915607619196292155@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220928112814.B0924C12D9B@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87ill7ldwb.fsf@posteo.net> <8735cajwwp.fsf@gnus.org> <87a66immpi.fsf@posteo.net> <87v8p6h04z.fsf@gnus.org> <87czat5g6v.fsf@posteo.net> <87o7uc2ovd.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24008"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 16 11:31:57 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ojzzx-00065N-D4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 11:31:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52836 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ojzzw-0000Ua-DI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 05:31:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59940) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ojzvF-00042G-GG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 05:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:46099) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ojzvD-0006L6-N4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 05:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F019D240103 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 11:27:00 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1665912421; bh=3F0XsQrSSeZXiawn0pq5AuiGKBva9Mj3VdI7EAX0e7w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=KUAV93EjNt8fTGZAsYseomjQ+XMqY6IPI4vTv63g3D8LvKCkB+B4ILIYXSAlkOkwy tI9Z9+Ci270+Qxi2Am151lRwVYh61ho3oJzQYvzXT8cq0OJhUrH+KdyAN7cbM/kIk8 Ekjx+kDJRnCca3bqIvsQz6GxFJSUJWtMBRx3ZivT0+znO6IyY7axY0QNBfYY6c7KQB xZ5JR/sMwPMFowhGX4wIEeKMGyxy7br6NKM4jJXKGljwGoV71cO7SWqVTz9u/aRfOl ShVDC8VRnOh+N5lIvfQXhiva2E439EYw7ntWYMuWcPbpf6H0B3rNtb+MFHCRjQZzfa Xq6VN+duBvAYQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4MqvsJ2T74z6tmR; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 11:27:00 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87o7uc2ovd.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 16 Oct 2022 09:45:26 +0200") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297848 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Philip Kaludercic writes: > >> On that topic, why do we have `and-let*' and no `and-let'? > > I'd rather ask "why do we have and-let at all"? =F0=9F=98=80 > > If you look at the in-tree usages of and-let*, most of them should > clearly have been when-let instead, so I think it was a mistake to add > and-let. I have recently started appreciating `and-let*' when I want to make it explicit that the last binding is the return value, but I guess that any (and-let* ((foo bar) ... (baz qux))) is the same as (when-let ((foo bar) ...) (baz qux))