From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Updating the "ELPA Protocol" Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 19:58:44 +0000 Message-ID: <87h6z0rnuz.fsf@posteo.net> References: <164484721900.31751.1453162457552427931@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <831qqg1306.fsf@gnu.org> <874jvcowzm.fsf@posteo.net> <83y1soypvx.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1song5x.fsf@posteo.net> <83v8nsyof7.fsf@gnu.org> <87leoond7l.fsf@posteo.net> <83r0yfzz01.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkpjyx3p.fsf@posteo.net> <83bkpjynmj.fsf@gnu.org> <87iljqya44.fsf@posteo.net> <8335auzo9s.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgd2ws8z.fsf@posteo.net> <831qqezkxj.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1slgq3m.fsf@posteo.net> <87bkpgfsqv.fsf@posteo.net> <87educ9fei.fsf@posteo.net> <87y1sk7xtg.fsf_-_@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8965"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 15 20:59:31 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ov25i-00025c-Ff for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:59:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ov25C-0005fJ-7E; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:58:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ov252-0005Zj-JE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:58:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ov251-0006tP-5J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:58:48 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E11D2240104 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:58:45 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1668542325; bh=Bd1flDtX0z124Ht1f+/fIrhcGBIFg4R/0JXJoqBrcDc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=fPhx5dxjLACuuxBAo5vfCK+ROHM+uZd4thB1FkPVqOa/UWZqcPRIID7pD9cW4LqCi +Sp87neAlz1KROZnSNF3i/7/xHW5e0R8REMfCiN5vfIdmo+ky6Kx23ixl0qK0M8/L2 JLvvLpAq2a4woZUg+OuPg7k/Tb/owoJ+BWXLOGQDOEZX9+lMn8Bac3cpCR0XKzWGRc 4p4SZP3g0oX5e6poHxga7p4Tm1Xrbax7tD2ZWQZXn+5wIs+SlEwNK0Xy/y2pDfkmqJ 9uP3tDWvM+0NY2Z9Llp3yKWv2k492xRD9hyl5Nbb46tClo6CIQ3koPiltdkUzI1czE 1Z3ZdnDF2VOsg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NBcSN5NfZz6tmF; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:58:44 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87y1sk7xtg.fsf_-_@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Wed, 09 Nov 2022 20:05:47 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:299882 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: >> I do think it's getting time to update the protocol based on the >> experience gained over the last 10 years, but I'm really not convinced >> `:lisp-dir` is a good addition. > > Oh: Are there any other things you think should be changed given the > chance? One issue I have been told is the issue of renaming a package, so that package.el can transparently handle the rename. That appears to not be supported.