unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Kévin Le Gouguec" <kevin.legouguec@gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com>,
	 stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keep network security info buffers after use
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 18:35:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h6k6chhq.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <834jg7d0p2.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 24 Dec 2023 18:28:41 +0200")

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com>
>> Cc: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 10:34:32 -0500
>> 
>> "The inspection" can be an arbitrarily complex process, during 
>> which the user should have all the usual power of Emacs available.
>
> You always have the possibility of aborting the connection with C-g
> and then doing all those arbitrarily complex processes.

But C-g dismisses the *Certificate Details* buffer, so that makes an
"arbitrarily complex" inspection somewhat hard to proceed with?

Sorry for butting in - no strong intuition re. what the better
UX/complexity tradeoff is between (a) letting the certificate buffers
linger after aborting (b) letting users enter recursive edits (TIL
that's a thing with rmc, neat) (c) adding a command to… do something.

All I can say is that the first time I met this prompt, my reflexes were

* C-x o                 - "Ah, right; rmc, can't do that"
* C-g; C-x b Cert TAB   - "Oh, drats; the buffer was killed"

So FWIW (a) would have had my vote, and FWIW² I'd have been fine with it
being optional & off by default.  But now that I know about rmc
leveraging query-replace-map and the C-r escape hatch, no strong
opinion.



  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-25 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-17 19:02 [PATCH] Keep network security info buffers after use Karl Fogel
2023-12-17 19:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-17 23:27   ` Karl Fogel
2023-12-18 17:36     ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-19  0:00       ` Karl Fogel
2023-12-19  5:31         ` tomas
2023-12-19 12:34         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-19 12:50           ` tomas
2023-12-19 13:05             ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-20 22:43           ` Andreas Schwab
2023-12-21  6:45             ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-17 21:03 ` Andreas Schwab
2023-12-19  3:49 ` Richard Stallman
2023-12-19  5:56   ` Karl Fogel
2023-12-19 12:51     ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-19 13:10       ` tomas
2023-12-19 18:57       ` Karl Fogel
2023-12-19 19:08         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-19 20:18           ` Karl Fogel
2023-12-20 21:34             ` Jens Schmidt
2023-12-20 22:26               ` Andreas Schwab
2023-12-21  6:29               ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-21 17:38                 ` Karl Fogel
2023-12-21 18:43                   ` Andreas Schwab
2023-12-21 23:10                     ` Karl Fogel
2023-12-22  7:29                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-22 10:00 ` Stefan Kangas
2023-12-22 11:51   ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-22 21:58     ` Jens Schmidt
2023-12-22 22:10       ` Jens Schmidt
2023-12-23  7:15       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-23 10:46         ` Jens Schmidt
2023-12-23 22:57       ` Karl Fogel
2023-12-24  6:14         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-24 13:52     ` Stefan Kangas
2023-12-24 14:51       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-24 15:34         ` Karl Fogel
2023-12-24 16:28           ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-25 17:35             ` Kévin Le Gouguec [this message]
2023-12-25 18:51               ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-25 20:23                 ` Tomas Hlavaty
2023-12-26 14:43                 ` Kévin Le Gouguec
2023-12-26 17:01                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-26 22:09                     ` Stefan Kangas
2023-12-27 12:54                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-25 20:18               ` Tomas Hlavaty
2023-12-27 12:35                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-12-24 18:42       ` [External] : " Drew Adams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h6k6chhq.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=kevin.legouguec@gmail.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=kfogel@red-bean.com \
    --cc=stefankangas@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).