From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: URGENT - which-key FSF contributor status Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 19:41:08 +0000 Message-ID: <87h6dqvy23.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87le4r98m9.fsf@jeremybryant.net> <86le4rjv9p.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5l78kc0.fsf@posteo.net> <87msp6o9o4.fsf@jeremybryant.net> <87sexelgnj.fsf@posteo.net> <86wmmqtmkl.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmmqmkh3.fsf@posteo.net> <87le32vyva.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37938"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , jb@jeremybryant.net, justin@burkett.cc, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 18 21:41:49 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sJeiC-0009gq-3A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 21:41:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJehp-00044Y-Vx; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:41:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJehl-00042O-HQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:41:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJehg-0002pQ-Ah for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:41:20 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33BBA240027 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 21:41:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1718739672; bh=XPBPwU+lnxSAX/icDymE0t3r8cnGycEk1V6ky1hz8K0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=RF2TdTDczuuJzwlqUjq0bXvKnUTqeY3QbUozgZL7WwkqBXqgVEVEEQYUpSeXB0EQN d2BdmWQ+lzcqBDr03BQ1J6Qr4RPZDDaBHLdhzVFOoRDmJP1RJFNW2Pl+CXYG/rjoLY YV36bHABU0XwS0UNjP7JBOtb2wXCDhZ2mXo1+rq98DBUtGbYodOWeISrJycAqwT/iI oGDjZpEr2YAA3Uqj7VUZmkZt+BEz5k9FhX/6oCjGpkQL3GYex3z/Fr+iSH36Koiuip yNGcSWxeYGxo+5eQagwLNGT2XdRIw5c4hNR8Caqkxqa0PnppOFYFH0PiBp6t+ts8TA 3Z0U4rIELGKoA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4W3cYx5yB8z6tmv; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 21:41:08 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2024 19:30:06 +0000") OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66"; preference=signencrypt Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320269 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: > Philip Kaludercic writes: > >>> Did you have a chance to look into these warnings? >> >> The first one is related to evil-support I am not familiar with the >> issue to find a better solution. >> >> The second one is not a valid warning, apparently package-lint doesn't >> distinguish between function calls and variable bindings. > > OK, thanks. It seems like it's not worth our time to fix either of them. Very well, then I'll proceed to merge the branch into master. -- Philip Kaludercic on peregrine