Re: how to speed up Lisp devel time

[Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org>]

Yuri Khan wrote:

> Interactive interface for more than one argument must be explicitly
> designed. Asking for a more defaulting, more validating sequential
> 'read-*'

What do you mean by that, at some point a human has to do it?

And that point is more than one?

Hardly, even in the Emacs source, using `interface', there are
tons of such interfaces setup with easy.

And, note that I'm not proposing what you say, I'm proposing
an interface interface so that you can set it up the way
you like.

That's an explicit setup. Or, can only Lisp do that? But yes,
many interfaces would be similar.

Let me hear it then, can you show me a bunch of "impossible"
interfaces of three (well, one is enough) that cannot be
automated, cannot be derived, and cannot be setup by a tool?

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal