From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 11:05:34 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87fz1hehvi.fsf@jurta.org> References: <200412211414.iBLEEZ903426@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200412211541.iBLFfBc03861@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1104830729 9014 80.91.229.6 (4 Jan 2005 09:25:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 04 10:25:18 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ClkwI-0001gj-00 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 10:25:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cll7U-0005K1-5B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 04:36:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cll4F-0004XY-1w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 04:33:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cll4C-0004WN-Nr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 04:33:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cll49-0004VN-QJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 04:33:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.98] (helo=MXR-5.estpak.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ClkrQ-0002Ut-Uk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 04:20:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-33-180-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.33.180]) by MXR-5.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AAF1E3260 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:17:43 +0200 (EET) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Katsumi Yamaoka's message of "Wed, 22 Dec 2004 13:31:27 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31801 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31801 There are two more cases where asking the question about undo info is inappropriate: 1. Visiting large files inside a tar archive in tar mode (with auto-compression-mode=t). The backtrace is below: Debugger entered--Lisp error: (quit) yes-or-no-p("Buffer file.ext (archive.tar.bz2) undo info is 331154 bytes long; discard it? ") undo-outer-limit-truncate(331154) tar-extract() call-interactively(tar-extract) 2. Running `man' with large man pages. Debugger entered--Lisp error: (quit) yes-or-no-p("Buffer *Man xdvi* undo info is 334507 bytes long; discard it? ") undo-outer-limit-truncate(334507) Man-fontify-manpage() Man-bgproc-sentinel(# "finished\n") -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/