From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New undo element (fun . args) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:07:22 -0500 Message-ID: <87fz0jyn19.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107098087 8790 80.91.229.6 (30 Jan 2005 15:14:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 15:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Kim F. Storm" , emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 30 16:14:39 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CvGmd-0008Ed-00 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:14:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CvGzJ-0001c9-D5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:27:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CvGwA-0000qW-T4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:24:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CvGw7-0000p6-SB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:24:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CvGw7-0000nY-DG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:24:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.184] (helo=tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CvGfc-0004vc-7j; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:07:24 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor ([67.71.119.232]) by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20050130150723.HRHR1919.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:07:23 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 37D102FD49; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:07:22 -0500 (EST) Original-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com In-Reply-To: (Miles Bader's message of "Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:24:37 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:32642 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:32642 >> To fix both of these problems, I suggest to change the format to: >> >> (apply FUN ARGS BEG . END) > How about: > (apply FUN BEG END . ARGS) > Seems more natural... 100% agreement. I even suggest we pass the BEG and END args to FUN. I.e. basically keep the current setup, except require the first 2 args to be BEG and END. Stefan