From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Romain Francoise Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock in terminal vs X11 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:06:04 +0200 Organization: orebokech dot com Message-ID: <87fyk8azqr.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> References: <17479.48400.907604.779724@notch.damtp.cam.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145556405 433 80.91.229.2 (20 Apr 2006 18:06:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 20 20:06:42 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWdXs-0001ga-Sf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:06:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWdXs-0007UO-KC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:06:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWdXb-0007P6-Ut for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:06:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWdXa-0007Oi-Ai for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:06:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWdXa-0007OV-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:06:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [82.67.41.165] (helo=yeast.orebokech.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FWdYx-0006E6-Dl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:07:31 -0400 Original-Received: from pacem.orebokech.com (pacem.orebokech.com [192.168.1.3]) by yeast.orebokech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1945712D1C; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:06:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by pacem.orebokech.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1E65452557; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:06:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Stephen Eglen X-Face: }9mYu,e_@+e!`Z-P5kVXa3\_b:hdJ"B)ww[&=b<2=awG:GOIM (Stephen Eglen's message of "Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:55:44 +0100") X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53147 Archived-At: Stephen Eglen writes: > Is the difference between windowing systems intentional? Yes -- on 8-color ttys only the comment delimiters are colored, not the comments themselves." -- Romain Francoise | The sea! the sea! the open it's a miracle -- http://orebokech.com/ | sea! The blue, the fresh, the | ever free! --Bryan W. Procter