From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [jidanni@jidanni.org: Re: emacsclient additional arguments buried] Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 19:24:37 -0400 Message-ID: <87fyhh6jii.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <877j2te9tu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1152055472 25257 80.91.229.2 (4 Jul 2006 23:24:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 23:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 05 01:24:30 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FxuFp-0000Ot-4K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 01:24:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FxuFo-0007B8-Da for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 19:24:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FxuFZ-0007B3-0C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 19:24:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FxuFY-0007Ao-67 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 19:24:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FxuFY-0007Al-2A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 19:24:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [18.19.1.138] (helo=cyd) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FxuTH-0004Z9-K3; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 19:38:23 -0400 Original-Received: by cyd (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 909984E2A9; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 19:24:37 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 04 Jul 2006 16:52:51 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:56535 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > What exactly needs to be done here? If we don't want the additional > files to be buried, that is easy enough to do (one-liner patch below). > But I'm not sure that is the correct thing to do---it could be > construed as interfering with the server's buffer setup. > > I think he wants them to go at the front of the buffer list, > as if each one had been visited when the server asked for it. > > At the same time, I can see how this might be undesirable for some > users. I suggest leaving the code alone, and simply mentioning this in the manual node on "Invoking Emacsclient". OK?