unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org
Subject: Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 18:50:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fyewpun5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1GMruB-0007hr-Fa@fencepost.gnu.org> (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon\, 11 Sep 2006 15\:57\:19 -0400")

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

>     > That is perhaps because of "1:0:1".
>
>     How can the compilation font-lock pattern distinguish this from a
>     legitimate error message?
>
> How about by the spaces in the "file name"?

It would wrongly reject compilation messages for file names containing
spaces.


Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org> writes:

> I don't know whqether it's uncommon or not, but if a packages uses
> libtool with "-version-info M:N:L" argument, the above line
> appears.  It may be too ad hoc but we can tell font-lock
> that a line matching with the regexp "-version-info [0-9]"
> is not an error message (if font-lock accepts such a
> request).

I don't see a straightforward way of doing this, but I guess it's
worth a shot.

>  Or, more generally, we may be able tell that a line matching with
> "^/bin/sh " is not an error message.

This would be wrong if you are compiling the file /bin/sh (unlikely as
that may seem).

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-12 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-06  8:16 subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer Kenichi Handa
2006-09-11  2:59 ` Chong Yidong
2006-09-11  3:56   ` Kenichi Handa
2006-09-11 19:57   ` Richard Stallman
2006-09-12 22:50     ` Chong Yidong [this message]
2006-09-13  3:42       ` Chong Yidong
2006-09-13  4:07         ` Kenichi Handa
2006-09-13 19:24         ` Richard Stallman
2006-09-13 19:24       ` Richard Stallman
2006-09-13 19:45         ` Stefan Monnier
2006-09-13 20:17           ` Chong Yidong
2006-09-15 14:29           ` Richard Stallman
2006-09-15 16:27             ` Stefan Monnier
2006-09-16 19:04               ` Richard Stallman
2006-09-17 19:17             ` Juri Linkov
2006-09-18 18:50               ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fyewpun5.fsf@stupidchicken.com \
    --to=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=handa@m17n.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).