From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: highlight failed part of isearch input Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:18:52 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87fxvzxc0j.fsf@jurta.org> References: <008101c86d06$31c2f1f0$9eb22382@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202776236 31462 80.91.229.12 (12 Feb 2008 00:30:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 12 01:30:58 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JOj33-0004oD-Ma for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 01:30:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOj2a-0000FS-B7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:30:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOj0P-0006gP-FR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:28:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOj0N-0006fT-JW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:28:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOj0N-0006fH-Bj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:28:11 -0500 Original-Received: from anti-4.kiev.sovam.com ([62.64.120.202]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOj0J-00089B-RD; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:28:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [83.170.232.243] (helo=smtp.svitonline.com) by anti-4.kiev.sovam.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JOj0B-000FsN-EA; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:28:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <008101c86d06$31c2f1f0$9eb22382@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:31:14 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Scanner-Signature: ba97961d419726f65b83e74233c16638 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: juri@jurta.org X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Header: Not Detected X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 2223 [Feb 11 2008] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {HEADERS: header Content-Type found without required header Content-Transfer-Encoding} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Rate: 11 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0278], KAS30/Release X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 6.x (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88810 Archived-At: >> It seems that only the tweaks that came out of the >> secondary discussion in this thread were applied; >> the original proposal was not. Here is the diff. >> >> Would someone please apply that patch, and ack? > > The patch was apparently never applied. It highlights the part of your > isearch input that fails to match. Did you fix all problems? I remember there were some rough edges. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/