From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Different heights for customize faces Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 03:07:52 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87fxsn5b3z.fsf@jurta.org> References: <4822B6FB.9030102@gmail.com> <87iqxn6mq9.fsf@jurta.org> <48261EE2.7030506@gmail.com> <8763tliu0v.fsf@jurta.org> <482643A1.5020309@gmail.com> <87tzh4psg5.fsf@jurta.org> <482774B7.300@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1210637932 1100 80.91.229.12 (13 May 2008 00:18:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 00:18:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 13 02:19:28 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JviEn-0006KX-G4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 May 2008 02:19:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45978 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JviE4-0007nw-Jy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 20:18:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JviDL-0007J5-06 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 20:17:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JviDJ-0007IZ-AI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 20:17:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56648 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JviDJ-0007IW-5l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 20:17:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:51358) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JviDJ-0004Ri-7D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 20:17:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:50736 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JviCP-0000gg-Fu for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 20:16:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JviDC-0004Q9-2z for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 20:17:52 -0400 Original-Received: from relay02.kiev.sovam.com ([62.64.120.197]:63835) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JviDB-0004MT-2s for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 20:17:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [83.170.232.243] (helo=smtp.svitonline.com) by relay02.kiev.sovam.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JviCe-000DGm-TD; Tue, 13 May 2008 03:17:13 +0300 In-Reply-To: <482774B7.300@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Mon, 12 May 2008 00:35:35 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Scanner-Signature: 233cb89e4cdd9c68f6fe52a505261b56 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: juri@jurta.org X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Header: Not Detected X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 2807 [May 12 2008] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {HEADERS: header Content-Type found without required header Content-Transfer-Encoding} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Rate: 10 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0278], KAS30/Release X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 6.x (1) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:97056 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22287 Archived-At: >>>> Also using the blue color for custom-variable-tag-face makes option names >>>> similar to links. Maybe we should use the same colors that font-lock >>>> defines for font-lock-constant-face and font-lock-variable-name and just >>>> make them bold? >>> I think that would be worth to try. >> >> Could you propose a better color? > > I think your proposal to reuse the font-lock colors is > good. `font-lock-variable-name' seems appropriate to inherit in > custom-variable-tag-face' - at least as a mnemonic (and that is probably > good for a quick overview). > > Not sure about what `custom-face-tag' could inherit from, but > font-lock-constant-face is not bad IMO. One thing that it would be more logical, but another thing how it would really look in Customize. Does this look good? -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/