From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul R Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Release plans Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:54:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87fxpaz3kc.fsf@gmail.com> References: <9119194.3603691218548242618.JavaMail.www@wwinf4615> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218564040 32126 80.91.229.12 (12 Aug 2008 18:00:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" To: alinsoar@voila.fr Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 12 20:01:31 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KSyBJ-0008Sh-BF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:01:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48531 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KSyAN-0007wH-83 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:00:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KSvGx-0004sx-6b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:54:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KSvGv-0004pH-DL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:54:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46799 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KSvGv-0004p4-9M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:54:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.185]:16537) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KSvGu-0001sk-Px for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:54:52 -0400 Original-Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so2722681mue.6 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:54:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:to:cc:subject:references:from :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=eSAkSApW1eTzghC/sP5XHIDf9ofbx2WtZsag1qDrZ1s=; b=Iy7sxjgKlwI6KtyGpz+aGLuv3dK+4/WomJ0ATcUFkyB5ngQsyCoKIOkbrwvuyt2h6b eq5HE/NArGz82jxgtnbi6kW14H3DHanfotPzCXFVhteBKPaobhqPRQWb4p4B1JcKYFTU 86/Nr9ySUMzTGYQS53e09x4VRJf+brDGIrdtI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:cc:subject:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=UzPfvGzRfe0YAO10JACgq0q6ZSX1Tnka8k1OOyhe93Bi3qQT7iN9FbcAzcfhWFzvc6 MPg6Dp/16hmz0tw/9samDCb4c2xG7f19Uv8r+EDcKCyrw1MMnSh0eXVx8H0bmsOCnnyC e73a1uMCrqOdgv4RY87mE+870LwmNIIN1ltA8= Original-Received: by 10.103.250.9 with SMTP id c9mr7152990mus.37.1218552891054; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:54:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ubuT42 ( [82.242.132.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u9sm6293358muf.12.2008.08.12.07.54.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:54:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9119194.3603691218548242618.JavaMail.www@wwinf4615> (A. Soare's message of "Tue\, 12 Aug 2008 15\:37\:22 +0200 \(CEST\)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:00:12 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102352 Archived-At: The number and the skills of people using microsoft windows and working at making emacs better everyday is highly sufficient to consider the windows port of emacs to be paid back and now rewarding. Those people now produce the same emacs lisp as any other emacs user. I do not use windows, but I run their lisp, and I thank them for that. Windows software certainly sucks by most aspects, starting with its proprietary philosophy. Yet the emacs port, as well as some Windows users, is of high quality. -- Paul