From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [beuc@gnu.org: Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] bzr move from sftp:// to bzr+ssh:// [done]] Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:26:34 -0400 Message-ID: <87fwwcwk5h.fsf@kslab.red-bean.com> References: <4CB1F16C.7060107@gmail.com> <8762x9fc1f.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <87d3rglp63.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <837hhomty0.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286828894 21855 80.91.229.12 (11 Oct 2010 20:28:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, svenjoac@gmx.de, Jason Earl To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 11 22:28:12 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P5Oye-000618-1d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:28:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33594 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5Oyd-0007oE-FK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:28:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42607 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5OyU-0007nF-5K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5OyN-000827-Bv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:27:58 -0400 Original-Received: from osh-net-219-98.onshore.net ([66.146.219.98]:54759 helo=sanpietro.red-bean.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5OyN-000811-9f; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:27:51 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44401 helo=kslab.red-bean.com ident=kfogel) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P5Oy7-00031R-B0; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:27:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <837hhomty0.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:05:11 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131620 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Jason Earl >> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:33:40 -0600 >> Cc: Christoph , >> Andreas Schwab , >> Sven Joachim , emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> bzr pull --remember bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/ >> >> will do the right thing on the next bzr pull. > >Is "bzr pull" the right thing to do with a bound branch? That's what >many people here use, so if it isn't TRT, the above could cause >trouble. I don't know, but I have a bound branch and I always use 'bzr up'. It seems to work fine.