Re: Some OpenWrt port related problems

[David Kuehling <dvdkhlng@gmx.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1289 bytes --]

>>>>> "Stefan" == Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> The problem with a simulated environment, that you're suggesting, is,
>> that OpenWrt packages (or rather the recipies used to compile a
>> package) need to be self-contained inside OpenWrt.  If I needed a
>> target system

> I'm somewhat familiar with OpenWRT, so I have an idea of how much work
> this would require in general.  But some targets may come with
> "readily available" simulators, so I thought maybe that was the case
> for the NanoNote as well.

Well, if I'm going through the hassle of porting a package to NanoNote
I'm trying to make it general enough to work on all OpenWrt platforms.
So finally we'll be able to run Emacs on off-the-shelf routers :)

>>> That's the question, yes.  But no, I have no idea how this can
>>> happen.
>> Ok, thanks for the answers.  Then it might be time to do some more
>> in-depth debugging to see where in loadup.el that entry originates.

> Indeed.  Grepping for Vload_file_name, Vload_history, and CANNOT_DUMP
> might give you a good start.  Good luck,

Maybe not before next year :)

cheers,

David
-- 
GnuPG public key: http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~dvdkhlng/dk.gpg
Fingerprint: B17A DC95 D293 657B 4205  D016 7DEF 5323 C174 7D40

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]