From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thierry Volpiatto Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pop-to-buffer and friends new behavior or bug? Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:19:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87fwn7vyys.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zklhhcys.fsf@gmail.com> <87ei2tzg3o.fsf@gmail.com> <4DFA690A.20205@gmx.at> <87d3iccuqo.fsf@gmail.com> <4DFCCDE6.30007@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308417628 32348 80.91.229.12 (18 Jun 2011 17:20:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 18 19:20:23 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXzBx-0004gt-Ii for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:20:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37524 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXzBw-0002Sj-LW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:20:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59165) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXzBi-0002R1-Li for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:20:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXzBh-0005LQ-7E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:43393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXzBg-0005Kk-Vn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:20:01 -0400 Original-Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so2879752wyf.0 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:20:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=ZQWZmX6gRNhdZq+WHbBzkmnjHYaNJeuOloqazHVnsQY=; b=SrUgRsDtMW2Oaos0HTVf8P6L41pDzkIvgVlrn/PreBecBdBGvXXkMZEbUTvy/EEUKI ky6E4PX1t/i/xyZDnT1Q5WhgWPDXsY4RU+oqh/ZcFlkiQaMFCO9z76CQdUNzt0ayGpKF HPgqXF9MjkTgxGOssnSzFJXmtvwtW5k6iNx8g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=pNOV/ngdcL3CvZMbuSWCJnhd3oIqQISwTwdSsVWFxXG4i1haSc+hMJNhoDkxGmlDk2 PtiWUtf/8x9h33w/dZvGwPfHYC72CGL4atKIbRzQiAaahfGNzUKy+yex1z4qnwUeD5rw CcqBZL+SvZqN3E5DN/oOQDHWp8so5B2oxqeBg= Original-Received: by 10.227.5.194 with SMTP id 2mr3348559wbw.93.1308417599872; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:19:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from thierry-MM061 (113.211.85.79.rev.sfr.net [79.85.211.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eq4sm1827111wbb.54.2011.06.18.10.19.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:19:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DFCCDE6.30007@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:10:14 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 74.125.82.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140654 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> That is ok now, except it doesn't honor >> (setq split-width-threshold nil) >> The window is splitted | (vertically?) > > I checked in a fix for this. With `display-buffer-alist' you can > inhibit splitting by adding a (pop-up-window-min-width . 1.0) specifier > (this is currently overriden when `split-width-threshold' is nil). Seem fixed now. >>>> but not for code that use switch-to-buffer-other-window. >>> That's bad. `switch-to-buffer-other-window' does call >>> >>> (pop-to-buffer buffer 'other-window norecord) >> `switch-to-buffer-other-window' still not working as expected. >> Maybe you can try ioccur.el and see what happen. >> It is working as expected as it is, you will have to uncomment the line >> with switch-to-buffer...(L964) and comment the next one >> pop-to-buffer...(L965) In the function `ioccur'. > > If the effect was that you got a new frame instead, then this should be > fixed now. There was a silly bug inverting the value of `pop-up-frames' > in `display-buffer-normalize-specifiers-1'. If you see another effect, > please tell me which one. Yes, it seem fixed too. Thanks for your work.;-) -- A+ Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997