From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sven Joachim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:49:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87fwivwp37.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> References: <83fwix2osa.fsf@gnu.org> <0B3EE7A4-D0D6-4D1E-ADC4-0BEE68F179B2@mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318607371 14387 80.91.229.12 (14 Oct 2011 15:49:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs devel To: Carsten Mattner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 14 17:49:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1REk0k-0002WH-9O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:49:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53298 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1REk0j-0004VF-Nj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:49:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37457) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1REk0g-0004V9-EW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:49:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1REk0f-000624-CL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:49:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:33397) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1REk0f-00061Z-0H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:49:21 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2011 15:49:17 -0000 Original-Received: from p4FC77FEF.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO turtle.gmx.de) [79.199.127.239] by mail.gmx.net (mp025) with SMTP; 14 Oct 2011 17:49:17 +0200 X-Authenticated: #28250155 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19aV3oPwJNai53RbQt5WMcvMvl09kr1YSh+jGabJO irfDMpZNg7U6Hc Original-Received: by turtle.gmx.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 29F8E3F4F0; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:49:17 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Carsten Mattner's message of "Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:18:12 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 213.165.64.23 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145221 Archived-At: On 2011-10-14 14:18 +0200, Carsten Mattner wrote: > For the record, I also use evil, because I can't live without > the quick and efficient editing of vi command mode. > It's a mix of vi and Emacs bindings combining the best > of both worlds. > I like Emacs and its extensibility, but miss efficient editing > of vi's command mode. I'm not particularly in favor of > vi(m) itself. > I mean even when I play around with Haskell's Yi editor > framework I tend to use the vi input configuration. > > Should I also try to disable evil? Probably won't help much. > From what I see in others' memory footprints my experience > doesn't seem uncommon. > Therefore I don't actually believe I have a local issue that's > specific to my config. I'm also experiencing memory leaks. My current session is at 82M, with the accumulated size of all buffers less than 1M; visiting files and then deleting their buffers does not increase memory footprint, but Gnus usage (visiting groups and articles) slowly but steadily does. Sven