From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gdb scripting language Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:56:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87fwget4e4.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87ty4wk90t.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87sjkgk56m.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1324475796 23837 80.91.229.12 (21 Dec 2011 13:56:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Carsten Mattner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 21 14:56:32 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RdMem-0004oe-4p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:56:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35910 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdMel-00070C-PK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:56:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46862) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdMee-0006zB-Fl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:56:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdMed-0000gm-8N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:56:24 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:50272 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdMed-0000gd-37; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:56:23 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536A67C2A; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:56:22 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=NbioVUUHW8IuQvo3vIjAJw+6iZQ=; b=XHRfmT CwItjcUxJPWU5PIXzakZqtBmVxMPt1bj4aP6+4qgMgTYFOQHljj1bnqC6YjS+vzm 6j1d7/icFUYcwBUwGP63v8MuM/Spb9ovfwA/+9r3Vn0tJpzKkPTuIkGx4f5YPaV8 nMZrcWo3esEWm9NnpQA3XFLD8yooDMcT1NvAU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=aLUBX59GQjRY3wgjKg34CMD282KkNug8 eLUPV2CeIOHx2TCkGokT1jD0KMYJ3isS7l25m3sUwVN4IUbxKA+Cr38/KL8W72pQ I9Yv9woFrYGBYGRQ3VZDBYrj1ZNVrq3iobJEOMApmzKBTJon22nyeMCyZgd2K0r6 GNdGOSvB5ek= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA9A7C29; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:56:22 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [184.174.165.119]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EABDD7C28; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:56:21 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Carsten Mattner's message of "Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:10:45 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 907FDF6C-2BDB-11E1-B009-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146899 Archived-At: On Mon 19 Dec 2011 22:10, Carsten Mattner writes: > there has been work on replacing emacs lisp with Guile. > > What's the status of that work? The goal of that work is to be a better elisp implementation, while also offering the ability to do things in Emacs with Scheme. Replacing all elisp is not a goal, at least for me. (Some people might be interested in that, but it is not a goal of the Guile project, I don't think.) The status is that Guile's elisp support will be quite good once BT Templeton's branch is merged to Guile, which should happen shortly. There has been little work on integrating Guile and Emacs though. It needs a few months' work from a good hacker. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/