From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Romain Francoise Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:37:37 +0100 Organization: orebokech dot com Message-ID: <87fw3egpla.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> References: <83mwxpmtp6.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw3hm0nn.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3srdh3d.fsf@gnu.org> <83pq2ib53h.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355135882 23781 80.91.229.3 (10 Dec 2012 10:38:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , dmoncayo@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 10 11:38:14 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti0kW-0007Vc-3t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:38:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40708 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti0kJ-0006mE-JV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 05:37:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti0kC-0006kI-5A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 05:37:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti0k5-0004wx-Rw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 05:37:51 -0500 Original-Received: from stringer.orebokech.com ([88.190.240.207]:47848) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti0jz-0004uu-9m; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 05:37:39 -0500 Original-Received: from silenus.orebokech.com (silenus [192.168.1.4]) by stringer.orebokech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C68B188016A; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:37:37 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by silenus.orebokech.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 382FBA014A; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:37:37 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <83pq2ib53h.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:59:14 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 88.190.240.207 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155419 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > This machine was 98% idle when I timed the bootstrap. fencepost is a Xen virtual machine so even if it's idle, the hardware itself may not be. > According to http://www.cpubenchmark.net, the CPU marks of the > machines mentioned in this thread are, top to bottom: > Intel Core i7-2600 8,628 > AMD Opteron 6128 4,999 > Intel Core i5-2410M 3,186 > Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 2,941 > Intel Core 2 duo T9300 1,709 FWIW, on my Core i7-2600 (4 cores, 8 threads), `make -j16 bootstrap' runs in about 1m30s: 403.12s user 20.83s system 463% cpu 1:31.37 total Fast enough to always do a clean build from a pristine source tree and be spared strange bootstrap errors...