From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Joshua Judson Rosen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"? Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 16:35:35 -0500 Message-ID: <87fvn17gbc.fsf@slice.rozzin.com> References: <20140301171337.53CC638073E@snark.thyrsus.com> <8338j1vkta.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393709745 31357 80.91.229.3 (1 Mar 2014 21:35:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 21:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Eric S. Raymond" , handa@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 01 22:35:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJrZY-0002CW-Pt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 22:35:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60936 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJrZY-0001Lu-Do for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 16:35:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJrZR-0001LU-Q1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 16:35:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJrZN-0000s5-BY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 16:35:45 -0500 Original-Received: from 209-20-69-211.slicehost.net ([209.20.69.211]:51003 helo=slice.rozzin.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJrZI-0000qz-CJ; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 16:35:36 -0500 Original-Received: by slice.rozzin.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 33FF1C85F2; Sat, 1 Mar 2014 16:35:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <8338j1vkta.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 01 Mar 2014 20:24:33 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.20.69.211 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170030 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > From: esr@thyrsus.com (Eric S. Raymond) > > Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 12:13:37 -0500 (EST) > > > > Here's the context: > > > > revno: 111954.1.4 > > committer: K. Handa > > branch nick: work > > timestamp: Fri 2013-03-22 00:18:44 +0900 > > message: > > Fix a bug introduced by revno:111954.1.97 > > > > It doesn't show up in a bzr log --levels=0 listing, and the fact that > > 97 > 4 suggests the reference is garbled. > > I think the correct reference is 111964.1.6. It was merged in > r112051. ... and the "revno:111954.1.97" was a reference to trunk revno:112051. The fact that the commit whose comment is making that reference is itself from a non-mainline branch suggests that the reference may actually not be garbled, but rather be from an obsolete context. The "111954.1.97" revno is actually correct relative to the "111954.1.4" commit and Handa's "work branch" (where it would have been 111954+4=11958; if you do "bzr branch trunk -r 111954.1.4 handa-work" and then do "bzr log -r 111954.1.97 --show-ids handa-work", this starts to become clear). (for the git people who are probably having a major WTF at this: it's perhaps on par with abbreviating git sha1sums down to just the first few hexits) -- "'tis an ill wind that blows no minds."