From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:32:04 +0100 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <87fvmxhfi3.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <837g8t8ouc.fsf@gnu.org> <20140219080524.25689b6b@forcix.jorgenschaefer.de> <83k3cr58o2.fsf@gnu.org> <530BAEE5.9040004@online.de> <87ppmatkpe.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87wqgfsxsr.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87wqgf37n4.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ha7gshu9.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <871tyko9l5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87eh2ks897.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87fvn0mk25.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87bnxorlol.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <877g8bmxal.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <877g8asfl0.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <8738iyjrl3.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87mwh5ridq.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87wqg9hn10.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87k3c9rddu.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393966212 26135 80.91.229.3 (4 Mar 2014 20:50:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 20:50:12 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 04 21:50:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WKwI8-0007MG-1d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:50:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48477 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKwI7-0000uZ-ND for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 15:50:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKwI0-0000q0-N6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 15:50:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKwHu-0007xq-Ke for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 15:50:12 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKwHu-0007v5-EZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 15:50:06 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WKw3L-0003PG-QJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:35:03 +0100 Original-Received: from x2f42c08.dyn.telefonica.de ([2.244.44.8]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:35:03 +0100 Original-Received: from dak by x2f42c08.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:35:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: x2f42c08.dyn.telefonica.de X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:DEqNRCz6RJfb606bPwadje/kK0I= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170146 Archived-At: "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > David Kastrup writes: > > > Sigh. I don't know _how_ often I have to repeat this. The problem > > is not "supporting features of Clang", the problem is _requiring_ > > features of Clang for supporting features of Emacs. > > No, the real problem is that our English dialects differ. As far as I > can tell from your "corrections" I use "support feature" where you use > "require feature", I use "implement feature" where you use "support > feature", but we mean almost exactly the same thing. Quite unlikely. "dialects" don't differ to a degree where causations are diametrically opposed. -- David Kastrup