From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: What's the best way to write complex emacs extension Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 13:12:45 +0900 Message-ID: <87fve21br6.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1414901600 5989 80.91.229.3 (2 Nov 2014 04:13:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 04:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "scopeview ." Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 02 05:13:13 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XkmXQ-0005r8-ON for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 05:13:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54867 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XkmXQ-0000R3-9W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 00:13:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XkmXG-0000OM-0K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 00:13:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XkmX8-0002g0-I8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 00:13:01 -0400 Original-Received: from shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.161]:40840) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XkmX8-0002ec-7z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 00:12:54 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22B61C3AA8; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 13:12:45 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 93E241A27CF; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 13:12:45 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta34) "kale" acf1c26e3019 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.161 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:176229 Archived-At: scopeview . writes: > failed (for example stringp) it hard to find out the failed predication > place. (no file:function:line_number or backtrace) edebug. XEmacs has a native Lisp debugger as well (maybe Emacs does too). > But it seems that xemacs had stop its development. The rumors of our death are greatly exaggerated, but this is not the place to discuss that.