From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: string> missing? Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 17:52:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87fv67mpxn.fsf@petton.fr> References: <87oakxkvqw.fsf@petton.fr> <83zj4grgkc.fsf@gnu.org> <87sia8n8b5.fsf@petton.fr> <87zj4gu821.fsf@gnu.org> <83sia8rdkm.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5crbfd.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0gr4eh.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433433191 30380 80.91.229.3 (4 Jun 2015 15:53:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 15:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , tsdh@gnu.org, Nick Andryshak , nicolas@petton.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 04 17:52:55 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0XRj-0002Hh-IJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 17:52:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42992 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0XRi-0003Hn-QB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:52:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46465) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0XRT-0003Hh-HG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:52:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0XRQ-0003N8-6p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:52:27 -0400 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:44526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0XRP-0003L6-Vo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:52:24 -0400 Original-Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967CE21B24 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 11:52:22 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:52:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=fhHaz75DpMK9RpEdGjkX9zYRTxw=; b=BU487 syNl8A4DyvYKVJLaQtOZyeIYHXiQjzzWMpHxenuA1CgIavJo513Y2gozvrogL3pt x8Ti+AQ1grYiMAMbhQD7mr+0bBISsCwcXA/nYyPv3DPjO8Z6tuwt9y3I3oo3zUWr axJLWugesJo2IZuARfVO+PL3kWQuUuTsqyqp4k= X-Sasl-enc: ogjPSXie2x86rdgEfsD618nl3qTE3BB1vxgfFNlRjaPw 1433433142 Original-Received: from blueberry (unknown [31.211.216.84]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 76C5868012B; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 11:52:21 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:187023 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan Monnier writes: >> Apply this same logic to string< and string>. > > Emacs is inconsistent. That's part of its inheritance. > If someone wants to add string>, I'm perfectly OK with it. I'll do that. > But I'm surprised noone is arguing here in favor of dropping string< and > making < and > accept strings instead! Yes, I thought about it, but then I wondered if that could be confusing, being so different from what < currently is. Nico =2D-=20 Nicolas Petton http://nicolas-petton.fr --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVcHQ0AAoJECM1h6R8IHkQIXEIAKn1PIZqkQctDVYmPfRh3GgQ /TUfWBkUU3EA24RJ5jeE1iLQYEj3p1eDRTaTVEaSXKytRNs+/wzLp+lYOJLPT7oo PsSIkfJF4UcGur4O2LyL3kQx/wuzcnlcDc6gmQ4/t98qtTFdbIEPHNe/Bt9yVd8w YL47MIbBeB5KyFTsolXLjAuvwFa6A5iVLJk3GvvrxHhhA94L5EnJTmh4C281AS/E kUklTMYwbkSDzF+DryI5nUlFnY2PqW05ehNnp2RBzKJa4HmB6nLUDp0QGhrXEsTI 6gcr6FLODrEQRXdaF2eOugF5oOdNXXEkPRXihIQSSOCu56KrKi6SB4HlR1w4YPE= =VHoW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--