From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New maintainer Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 22:48:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87fv1pyrbg.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> References: <874miapdhs.fsf@openmailbox.org> <8737xuuw2y.fsf@rabkins.net> <87lhbmkrle.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87si5r22qh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5612CEA6.3010809@yandex.ru> <87egh95cze.fsf@gmail.com> <5612D36B.1030906@yandex.ru> <87a8rx5awg.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444078163 24788 80.91.229.3 (5 Oct 2015 20:49:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 20:49:23 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 05 22:49:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCh5-0007FA-4R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 22:49:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47702 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCh4-0000yb-Cg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:49:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44353) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCh0-0000yM-6h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:49:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCgx-0002XP-01 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:49:06 -0400 Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([5.45.97.173]:50298) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCgw-0002VG-ND for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:49:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From; bh=Z1hR9nldv5R+n9Urbtvze9oE7QLYnTyJ1gaVxNoleSM=; b=W0u/Z9eJtbmOGMzZmQAfV4JPzE+dfz7QFXscrHIh3K6wfKkd7N7pCzC/nwCpIoZfZqiXHgw2q+G17p9X1fE6WQiV3mu3FWGi48mbh9ahJqvRUiEjFNWXbExIRQ34HTJ+; Original-Received: from ip4d1645ea.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([77.22.69.234] helo=isaac.fritz.box) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCgq-0008F1-9W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 22:48:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:37:34 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 5.45.97.173 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190972 Archived-At: John Wiegley writes: > I interpret him as meaning that the support should not favor non-GCC compilers > in any way, not that GCC should determine the least upper bound on > functionality. I'd suggest to read the past discussion on this to better understand Richard's position. There's a good summary at LWN: http://lwn.net/Articles/629259/ -David