From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joakim Jalap Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Overlays as an AA-tree Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 18:07:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87fuol8gxv.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <87d1jylv43.fsf@fastmail.com> <87a8f0p69w.fsf@fastmail.com> <878tujlmp0.fsf@fastmail.com> <87k2dx97tq.fsf@fastmail.com> <834m51csqz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475041075 24733 195.159.176.226 (28 Sep 2016 05:37:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 05:37:55 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 28 07:37:52 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bp7Yz-0005dR-PU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 07:37:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56124 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bp7Z0-0006l6-3C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:37:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51388) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bp7U7-0001sm-Gq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:32:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bp7U5-0002iI-PF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:32:46 -0400 Original-Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:52138) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bp7Tw-0002Zm-OY; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:32:39 -0400 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B4120775; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:32:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:32:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=hLmZH Erz5Wl54Zb4oChOGkX5w+Q=; b=DkUeA4JCdQM6PiaGouIxTBVeqzQcxcIPKBToy yOX7UCMIMT9UJKzu1CEzHP70JCkXaqvMwQi8PGE26/lDC6HrCcrOh75E/1pelBoI bCpQrIVYpTrF+/KhK9AfHgD7cBKPmO4L4N8FJhHRBrHP6tdf5YkxNQnqQcyBm65Y MAIUSw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=hLmZHErz5Wl54Zb4oChOGkX5w+Q=; b=ALCyu rj/W/xQHDl3cxZGkkHRlkjRdZGpiRiWwgU1IrMP5t0hGt36DTl+uy700YcYjtvFr NQ+y8qZzDFxf7sYcVamvuZ9RCkb62u4HbCfXydIqhuCxGQNXjEZlLbFai88BrH1/ o4HbrmT8tsG8X4DrSouigfiWk3rP/GQjXXAiWc= X-Sasl-enc: 8snpjQ7QOy/f8vH0mToUA/aOWQxwdXm9oiIDFEWbCMzO 1475040742 Original-Received: from thinkpad (79.138.133.90.mobile.tre.se [79.138.133.90]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A5997CC084; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:32:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <834m51csqz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:38:44 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.26 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207849 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Seeing 1100 frames in GC is nothing unusual. In fact, I've seen 30K > frames in a perfectly healthy GC. Garbage collection is deeply > recursive, so just that number of frames doesn't mean GC went haywire. Good to know :) > I agree with Stefan: most likely you didn't update the GC code to deal > with your implementation of overlays. Yes, of course you are right. I had simply forgotten to set the gcmarkbit! But now it works, the build finished and emacs -Q starts and runs just fine :) Thanks -- Jocke