From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: DBus binding & direct connections (p2p)? Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:33:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87fudg6bjp.fsf@detlef> References: <87zibq5bii.fsf@petton.fr> <871sp16mjw.fsf@detlef> <87shhhhso6.fsf@petton.fr> <87wp6s6hyd.fsf@detlef> <87pockj2u7.fsf@petton.fr> <87mv7oj2ie.fsf@petton.fr> <87o9s46c44.fsf@detlef> <87k22siyz3.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1501241629 29244 195.159.176.226 (28 Jul 2017 11:33:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:33:49 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Emacs Devel To: Nicolas Petton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 28 13:33:44 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1db3WZ-00073O-6o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:33:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47530 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1db3Wb-0005m5-Um for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:33:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57539) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1db3WW-0005gj-1X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:33:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1db3WR-0001QT-LK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:33:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:52765) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1db3WR-0001Pp-B2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:33:35 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.86.53.188]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M3S2C-1dsrUJ0wO8-00r1B3; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:33:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87k22siyz3.fsf@petton.fr> (Nicolas Petton's message of "Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:26:40 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:p56Ri/kTdE7me5/F9cTtgSuM+5jZxWOiayBrcPk6GmWJoJiYbeA bmKrX0VvG8tig/kqBKZVwRUHUk7i7FTri9u6wBN7JVsoB7Qjzw+byJtk+e0jGqP/sNHlawK mBW9y7BriAJaP+7RW2dXIv2REH0tYZEHMaSFTTewwRYi+zl+hgrKrHm4vhGqY1D9W+VouL5 SLgZAhTWpIK0Cj6BGpXYg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:r5+H1w1KuyI=:msceh6z3R7l+mvQhyeU6au EmMdPbAR5nf8DF/JzKChklousZlbe6Uqzk4eadd9c9nsTQwpFJ19a+8GhMhviaUuw44gab4VA iQfl0w+aNW4bkVr0KwObnI1NvXi7Ky6wTNJolEUHC/4F5NyqTY8jIJKbxY8yTQ++K8+rfG7GQ brws9lB+QJUR/Jbg70yWWcTmUIukej/zyVHq3MeDwOlBzerc2FPip7Di+/lTzCdEcWPnn4Rng F8t8DpMTymZ03Fx+W9/PJQcdbSLhuF62mAI+iXbt7XIZOp1wtADLFHR2F6EYf8MBmPSK9dZJP Q9tIBqokIe0XHH38hvQJmvxUIcuL67Yz5buYvRjwhIOnbbZFF1uvVgPJGB1fx8MASPc/7DC3H X/oOFgRcTTsAa0kEVwmCFnMNTwxDGY4K0oGraCQeDXp9DxvT9fVxSwy3Cwp/+lKksFIwhmRYN QufGAsT10q/o7tMaBlWiybCeiwvY+pQGLOd0EzXgp6ZRDKHDMv0S7evkHCvWM3RquBM5QmJEp EPSvEdWhKYgq+H2FOw1tqzIuAvqH4Dos/dST73r+QqbLjt9gQKz1/M559KYqT4KPVbksV0t/B 2aLVQAZ6CxUvqZ2ncrFmqeBmVABfjfyXDThrCjJT5sSkDOf3BeoNXp5f6eHC7z/Zv3eSKsXoK 7MCZ2yGXrMhM/d47YvOJ/MGoAV+FH07a9eqTe2g85f/lqCLHpIx3H3kA4TrBt7hQ3VJ0hhp5I 4RmJuHlNtFtgJx6LjT97zbTdBh+tM0Nuk8QirKKgWu62Qa0hIa2UCxnRjK4+nf4BdhAEZpTV X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:217102 Archived-At: Nicolas Petton writes: >> Implementing something like Java's org.freedesktop.dbus.DirectConnection >> seems to be expensive, so I fear we haven't anything in Emacs which >> could be used w/o a bus. > > I don't understand, why it would be expensive? It must be in C, I suppose. And while listening, it must implement something a bus (daemon) is supposed to handle. Just from roughly reading that Java implementation. But I might be wrong. You could try to implement yourself, of course. > Cheers, > Nico Best regards, Michael.