From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "If you're still seeing problems, please reopen." [Was: bug#25148:] Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:24:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87ftih4dt4.fsf@gnus.org> References: <20191117113054.49837.qmail@mail.muc.de> <87pnhq7mxg.fsf@gnus.org> <87bltaz9g4.fsf@telefonica.net> <834kz25qp9.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2wexsv1.fsf@telefonica.net> <83sgmm4a08.fsf@gnu.org> <87h832xqxr.fsf@telefonica.net> <20191117192558.GC11551@ACM> <87a78uxot6.fsf@telefonica.net> <87a78uuvde.fsf@gnus.org> <8853390e-f4a5-c295-4f94-cf417ec8db5f@yandex.ru> <83wobv2684.fsf@gnu.org> <878soakddl.fsf@gnus.org> <83wobuzf8y.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="261180"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 21 13:25:19 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iXlWR-0015iX-2U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:25:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39612 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXlWJ-0006Ph-EP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 07:25:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46113) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXlWD-0006PY-C7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 07:25:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXlWC-0003tU-5x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 07:25:05 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:46104) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXlWB-0003sC-Vd; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 07:25:04 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iXlW4-0004IT-Cj; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:24:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83wobuzf8y.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:25:49 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242558 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Of course, if somebody wants to hit the "merge pull request" button >> in Gitlab, they can do that, but for most smaller pull requests, >> Gitlab would just email the patch (presumably) and we can apply it >> locally on our machines before pushing to the repo, just like now. > > What you describe is not the PR workflow that people are used to. The first part of the sentence does, I think? Send a pull request, and somebody else pushes a button in the web interface to merge it. Which Gitlab offers. The latter part of that sentence is our current work flow, and is, of course, not the pull request workflow that people are used to. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no