From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 23:52:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87fszw5w19.fsf@posteo.net> References: <9c9af088-580f-9fb1-4d79-237a74ce605c@inventati.org> <874kgkxxs0.fsf@posteo.net> <78741fe6-2612-d7c9-2bc4-0b68ea7fa51a@yandex.ru> <76a4d0e2-117b-165d-d56e-5bc2f504b50c@yandex.ru> <87blapln0r.fsf@posteo.net> <37bd2e96-ce04-eb6d-24da-fdd7ea427e61@yandex.ru> <87im4wx2ct.fsf@posteo.net> <83ft0080hi.fsf@gnu.org> <16784f40-b959-9a84-65d4-93b71d1bebec@yandex.ru> <5d5d0152-bb07-1bdd-6370-9498d4e4b867@yandex.ru> <9408552c-5964-0eef-d821-ab2a79e5d7c7@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20380"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 11 23:53:27 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lVi1H-0005Cb-Ig for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 23:53:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48572 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVi1G-0006WS-FM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 17:53:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVi0J-00061l-7C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 17:52:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:41392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVi0E-0002GH-Sg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 17:52:26 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 076791A022E for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 23:52:19 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1618177940; bh=/N79SNQZPV4slTOiVUwuftC3utUDvespEW0DkLpRBZ4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=Row6Jr59HEeQRQ6Sz3jnMrmAZZ3CbByeVIxLCP2Rl6YyMUtTvjinPGkgAuWwg6iHS 4PhRZAy2vCmYWz5QkgFyQqXUhjmcJiy6+JmyNUDs93SeFXS7L0IYdI1LAsGdpR88VY jr9C5aWaTyBvOvHKV1Goy7YdrtWfhJU6KW8WUUrDBIbMFXl0VJt9XTYRAcTGeB3QIY 7lWlUzm+bmCcl9AIVLdhETywvAD+rciNTuCfq14+9Qi3Wd6tK/p5QU6dKPgfXGqkUs WPUXcjxFM3UAnbo5wAwGTNPwDUo171KMhIKLXEcPPQqusMEho7EWjOoSSYawDZ4UHx 3QSGOXURPouuQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4FJQZW1KgLz9rxL; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 23:52:19 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <9408552c-5964-0eef-d821-ab2a79e5d7c7@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:11:47 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267917 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: >>> It would still miss the ability to quickly accept one of them >>> with RET. >> Right, but the cycle-threshold helps with that, no? > > At the moment, IIUC, the UI either lets you cycle, or shows the > *Completions* buffer, but not both at the same time. I get the *Completions* buffer if I press '?', or do you mean something else? -- Philip K.