From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : [emacs bookmark.el] Sorting by last set Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 20:45:51 -0500 Message-ID: <87fshb7tps.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <875ylhvu4k.fsf@red-bean.com> <87a6ar84rn.fsf@elite.giraud> <878rq82r05.fsf@red-bean.com> <87h74voaei.fsf@elite.giraud> <878rpznts7.fsf@elite.giraud> <87y1vl4do9.fsf@red-bean.com> <875yi8ej5d.fsf@elite.giraud> Reply-To: Karl Fogel Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38131"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Drew Adams , Lars Ingebrigtsen , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel To: Manuel Giraud Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 01 03:46:51 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oTZIA-0009gJ-En for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 03:46:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46788 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTZI8-0002ER-Qg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 21:46:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37200) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTZHN-0001a2-Sm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 21:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([45.79.25.59]:55132) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTZHM-0002BG-20 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 21:46:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=red-bean.com; s=202005newsp; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date: Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=iqnDkO2jjp0Z68wmjCC8GEdwL7oqCrTVMf98xNzanJ0=; t=1661996757; x=1663206357; b=h+3K0K6JHGP6w1KOZaG2ZL/fH8QVTaL6naP8yVhmTUZ4hlNXowsCODecuAC4MAFGz2WXlUEPJg9 n4u+PXTcAILjuiDJSFpOaWmTyb/MZ0REYP6JmSHUNruMJgyNYhDrl0+KEBpeOp8XOodW0EZhBPafs QSikRt6CM5AdhwbFKuLACRU36SgkBTkFGc7S/ozXhdQZw6kzyU0xUOaS4mIKJrawgcQRdNoL9Jx3a DMniFWFlkWX/pknWHlfPHgpklKkVjiSvDkQauEfqbQ/1YICgXA0XtQsnJBf+sHgdIFRTYsTKiyXgw +XlyGB6wnYaG9ZQpXqXOWDoiEPYueFU60LIg==; Original-Received: from [2600:1700:5654:2110:9d7c:343:991d:a240] (port=36074 helo=tcd) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1oTZHD-001ktQ-Qp; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 01:45:51 +0000 In-Reply-To: <875yi8ej5d.fsf@elite.giraud> (Manuel Giraud's message of "Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:39:58 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.79.25.59; envelope-from=kfogel@red-bean.com; helo=sanpietro.red-bean.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294465 Archived-At: On 31 Aug 2022, Manuel Giraud wrote: >Karl Fogel writes: > >[...] > >> Manuel, it looks like this change hasn't been pushed yet. I >> was about >> to review it, but I noticed there was some commentary in the >> thread >> following up to your post. Did you have a revised version of >> the >> patch in response to any of the commentary, or should I just >> review >> the original patch as you posted it on 14 June 2022? >> >> I'll attach the patch below for convenience. > >Hi Karl (sorry for this late reply), > >With the comment from Lars that "last-modified" could be >understood as >"Last time it was modified", I think this patch is not required >anymore. Thanks, Manuel -- good to know. And I'm the last person anyone should apologize to for a late reply, don't worry. (My record is 15 years, I think, but that's not to say I couldn't beat that some day.) Best regards, -Karl