From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native compilation of Keyboard Macros Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 20:00:49 +0000 Message-ID: <87fsgpg49a.fsf@posteo.net> References: <878rmj408c.fsf@posteo.net> <86wna1c2hl.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87k061g8m2.fsf@posteo.net> <865yhlc093.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39429"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Andrea Corallo To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 17 22:01:51 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oZe0d-000A4d-0G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 22:01:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56226 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZe0c-00031M-0Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 16:01:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52512) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZdzx-0002L1-Jl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 16:01:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:55727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZdzt-00077B-Dz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 16:01:09 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86821240101 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 22:00:59 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1663444862; bh=uXNXfqBRy9KxwRlC1d9OebLMgme6tPAy8zTl11vzMGk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=oy9E/hqTBFvpGJMpCIsSPxIeD0/MWYh6vK1RDryomOyrFFrLT6MIjCt+48y3A2CE9 hJxkOg/6r0hoAs3mLS+5TEkyiiDBxXYDivdL/wzhsXNjAzixHT2VUL5ckF87zmupBm pA5TWJXjWpCrFADKAUh+tFu345iZ7VNTjp1dUYF9PT8Rr9VJvZwCxp/K11dvI/pIN6 hzOmQMiprXHUIUC/J5DKrlwhe46j5UjNg9g2LSp9wYYdRAFR2piai2lLPNfoLHv5+j PIdCFGuOck0QfPtj2QqZtYzGBotIS2Dd30NlRqmFVwBvSZLB4CkV7yVKl7b/BMw62t +aBM8TGQ/EDiQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4MVMJ859q3z9rxP; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 22:00:56 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <865yhlc093.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sat, 17 Sep 2022 21:40:56 +0300") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:295545 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: >>> 1. at level of complex command execution, such as from the history >>> retrieved by `repeat-complex-command` (C-x ESC ESC), for example: >>> >>> (rgrep "macro" "* .*" "emacs/lisp/") >>> >>> 2. at level of commands corresponding to all typed keys, >>> such as retrieved by `view-lossage` (C-h l), >>> for example, for the same as above: >>> >>> M-x ;; execute-extended-command >>> r ;; self-insert-command >>> g ;; self-insert-command >>> r ;; self-insert-command >>> ;; minibuffer-complete >> >> Intuitively I would expect the first level to make more sense, though I >> see that when considering commands like `self-insert-command' you >> couldn't just deduce all the command invocations and wrap them in a >> `progn' body. At the same time, what is there to compile on the second >> level? You still need to look up all the commands and invoke them. As >> Stefan said, it is perhaps necessary to either detect what commands can >> be safely converted into repeat-complex-command'-esque representations >> (and what commands can be assisted/transformed), and only optimise if >> that is possible. > > Keyboard macros are executed on the keys level, so even the decision > what complex command to execute might depend on the position of that > command in the completion list of `M-x', e.g.: > > M-x ;; execute-extended-command > r ;; self-insert-command > ;; minibuffer-complete > ;; switch-to-completions > ;; next-completion > ;; next-completion > ;; next-completion > ;; next-completion > ;; choose-completion OK, but wouldn't that exclude the possibility of it being compiled, *unless* there were some way to translate the rest of the input into something else.