From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2023 10:02:18 +0000 Message-ID: <87fs5yafh1.fsf@localhost> References: <83r0plgjeo.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7kpxapo.fsf@localhost> <83mt09gcaf.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmzbc3af.fsf@localhost> <83cz13g811.fsf@gnu.org> <87lefrbvjw.fsf@localhost> <83h6qfecxt.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttuffcnv.fsf@yahoo.com> <87pm53eys1.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7767"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Po Lu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: tomas@tuxteam.de Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 08 12:03:31 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qI4mo-0001mh-B0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2023 12:03:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qI4ll-00029J-KR; Sat, 08 Jul 2023 06:02:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qI4lg-000293-G3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2023 06:02:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qI4le-0000I4-0b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2023 06:02:20 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFD6D240027 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2023 12:02:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1688810535; bh=ZN9YUNWSwZsHPF731n8walMnj9EMlrM/bvX5LjS4CEk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=GMjgj70fD0Z09olhLGTrapENxajADoYCHDNnZZsORapGwyuFylpdVvhfTS3hgZthF 30xClRLfq86+gHHlb8MY7nbPngIe7bWo618uEXkNCtuzYtf26/pR4iUs3614qhiLMC uivLc8gD/l9H5cXhBoJqJnXPqmD+u+N23vY2fMbcqsuNUFESX5Q4QgjnsNtE2XKqIG 8GuJ5ZmrmHznSgzQLG8UVx3DmMHVAXu4zI41Gjdek9/1K2O0uJtE2SHYi9OMRU5NlT y2Dlkeqo2zilLooRB+vj9FZaHOOB61/Nz0CqgSJ4Kn1+kB7AJ2o8PNd45TuU1BxHM1 cGDiQiUjszOjQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Qym5g0qKgz6tvq; Sat, 8 Jul 2023 12:02:14 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:307607 Archived-At: tomas@tuxteam.de writes: > Reducing blocking waits for external stuff (processes, network) would > already be a lofty goal for Emacs, and far more attainable, I think. Would you mind elaborating? AFAIU, the bottlenecks in these scenarios are still on Lisp side and are not specific to process/network handling. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at