From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keep network security info buffers after use Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:26:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87frzwwlwb.fsf@igel.home> References: <87plz4irev.fsf@red-bean.com> <87sf3ywxak.fsf@red-bean.com> <83h6keicdy.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5q6rpfj.fsf@red-bean.com> <83wmtaggdq.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7emosib.fsf@red-bean.com> <512a0684-f69c-4c7d-802f-274d4769426e@vodafonemail.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29276"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Karl Fogel , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jens Schmidt Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 20 23:27:53 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rG52f-0007LM-Op for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:27:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rG51l-0004wy-OF; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 17:26:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rG51j-0004wb-D5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 17:26:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rG51g-0001of-TI; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 17:26:55 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SwSpZ1gr6z1s9RW; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:26:46 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SwSpZ09Cnz1qqlY; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:26:46 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id wm7agcCYpSB9; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:26:45 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: 0vpGQv03uz4Gpm15rvi4YLiMJQfG+ImbWiiCbLurOSLj+pUdp9OLE+NvCETO1JnO Original-Received: from igel.home (aftr-62-216-202-82.dynamic.mnet-online.de [62.216.202.82]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:26:45 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D0C832C1264; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:26:44 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <512a0684-f69c-4c7d-802f-274d4769426e@vodafonemail.de> (Jens Schmidt's message of "Wed, 20 Dec 2023 22:34:22 +0100") X-Yow: I HAVE a towel. Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1; envelope-from=whitebox@nefkom.net; helo=mail-out.m-online.net X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314023 Archived-At: On Dez 20 2023, Jens Schmidt wrote: > Sorry for chiming in here, but this issue intrigued me. So I tried some > other command where read-multiple-choice is used, namely `kill-buffer' > hen you try to kill a modified buffer. And in that case, I could very > well C-x o out of the multiple choice prompt. For example, to save the > buffer currently being killed with C-x C-s behind the back of the prompt. The diffence is the LONG-FORM optional argument. In the case of kill-buffer, it is controlled by use-short-answers. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."