Re: master 930c578c104: ; Improvements to PEG documentation

[Michael Heerdegen via "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org>]

Hello Eric,

why do you use the term "lambda form" here?

| +@defun peg-run peg-matcher &optional failure-function success-function
| +This function accepts a single @var{peg-matcher}, which is the result of
| +calling @code{peg} (see below) on a named rule, usually the entry-point
| +of a larger grammar.
| +
| +At the end of parsing, one of @var{failure-function} or
| +@var{success-function} is called, depending on whether the parsing
| +succeeded or not.  If @var{success-function} is called, it is passed a
| +lambda form that runs all the actions collected on the stack during
| +parsing -- by default this lambda form is simply executed.

AFAIU the function is just passed a function.  An anonymous function
maybe, but certainly a function value, not a function form - so just
daily business - or do I miss something?


TIA,

Michael.