From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: find-file-dwim.el Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:20:43 +0000 Message-ID: <87frs0jtok.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87o76qs8el.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87le1urtgp.fsf@dataswamp.org> <878qxtle3a.fsf@posteo.net> <87o76pq6hb.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87sew0k3um.fsf@posteo.net> <87jzhcqw4a.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4009"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Emanuel Berg Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 23 12:21:37 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sWCeH-0000q4-Ik for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 12:21:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sWCdY-0005fz-EG; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 06:20:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sWCdV-0005Y2-Np for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 06:20:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sWCdT-00023m-JS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 06:20:49 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 924BA240028 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 12:20:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1721730044; bh=g/juDm1lTuR5ws4fEY7HNcPwbnT/R7/Or4+ZaYK4caI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=EBqMSTKUaKCvu2NuMTsEL6JraPh00wrUjZCk5W+F9PUYH49Iefemc8BRio4UORJJT V4v6OVuqVHD6HvtIKn7eVYSlHMzvh6lk97jPXIcP5ZiDuwJAuSiqeRXxH5bwW45P3z Tr6AEZT9NRDcdZMyGjLwJu37AISKffUGfjbfJaqy9UjfEZnKWgbuLawBVfd3UphGPQ f9AiCwg1Cpb/uX2MPsNucfCPHITaAzypLn6pydRV2ccZraQmr/9m66c2XZk9VTyNKr cHVCY5Nz2Q5aXKkLlcSjSJE4JG2uoiODWL7g27/0AaHHb5KBtF+RM9AoTU9wENIYpN 30Fp2ORyMEh7g== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4WStT76Ndxz6twZ; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 12:20:43 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87jzhcqw4a.fsf@dataswamp.org> (Emanuel Berg's message of "Tue, 23 Jul 2024 11:46:13 +0200") OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66"; preference=signencrypt Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:321977 Archived-At: (You are still dropping emacs-devel from the CC) Emanuel Berg writes: > Philip Kaludercic wrote: > >> My apologies if I offended you, it certainly wasn't my >> intention. > > Really? But if so, it is alright then. > >> My "job" is just to review ELPA submissions, and I wanted to >> check if your message was a proposal to add a package >> or not. > > Of course not at this point, not even being anywhere close to > the form required by ELPA? > >> That is clear, my question was with what intention are you >> posting your code on the development mailing list: >> >> (a) To add the code to ELPA, >> (b) To add the code to the Emacs core, >> (c) None of the above. > > Well, it is not up to me where it will be added, so I focus > now on completing it. Then testing and if it is an > improvement, we take it from there. That is what confused me. Usually people don't share prototypes this early with the mailing list. But of course it is also up to you where you'd like to have this kind of a feature added, as soon as it is mature enough. But as mentioned in my comments, you should clarify what the "DWIM" aspect of your script is. Find-file already has some DWIM-ish stuff going on with the "future history" (M-n), so I am guessing your plan is to do something different? >> Here are a few comments and improvements, fwiw: > > Thanks, all is good then. -- Philip Kaludercic on peregrine