Richard Stallman writes: > The docstrings of the functions > > > calendar-extract-year > > calendar-extract-month > > calendar-extract-day > > > are where the (MONTH DAY YEAR) format is mentioned. > > Would someoe like to add some comments at the start of the file > documenging this data structure? Attached is a patch which adds such a comment, based on my previous message; let me know if I should open a bug report for this. For now I take it that it's better not to touch the calendar code? I don't think there is any constructor function for dates, or at least, I see that throughout the calendar code, there are many uses of "(list month day year)" to construct dates, so there might be a lot of code to fix if we change the representation, and it might be hard to be sure we've made all the necessary changes. Anyway, this is more work than I want to do at the moment, though I'm willing to take a stab at it eventually if others here think it would be worthwhile. Best, Richard