From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Mario Lang <mlang@delysid.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Something smells rotten in redisplay
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 18:44:29 +0200
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <87eldtdqj6.fsf@lexx.delysid.org>
References: <20020722105950.4693.LEKTU@terra.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1027529129 14199 127.0.0.1 (24 Jul 2002 16:45:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 16:45:29 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17XPGS-0003gu-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 18:45:28 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17XPVL-0000UZ-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 19:00:51 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17XPGc-0003Rk-00; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:45:38 -0400
Original-Received: from 212186194087.graz.teleweb.at ([212.186.194.87] helo=lexx.delysid.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17XPFW-0003DO-00
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:44:30 -0400
Original-Received: from mlang by lexx.delysid.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17XPFV-0000V3-00
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 18:44:29 +0200
Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20020722105950.4693.LEKTU@terra.es> (Juanma Barranquero's
 message of "Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:08:29 +0200")
Original-Lines: 20
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6014
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6014

Juanma Barranquero <lektu@terra.es> writes:


[...]

> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (quit)
>   recursive-edit()
>   byte-code("=C6!=1B,HG=1B(B =1B,HH	=1B(B!=1B,H\=1B(Bn=1B,C?

Seeing this reminds me of a question I have: Is that
backtrace representation of byte-code("...") really necessary that way.
The actual string is useless in most cases, you can't really copy
that and use it for something.=20=20
COuldn't we either elide such byte-code strings, or replace them with
a human readable version of a byte-code string?


--=20
CYa,
  Mario