From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Henrik Enberg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent) Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:38:10 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87elaabbh9.fsf@enberg.org> References: <200210210726.g9L7QI1l014171@gbr.newt.com> <200210231948.g9NJmdBG015635@gbr.newt.com> <200210240725.g9O7PKI11467@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200210240928.g9O9Sjs12808@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5x65vsozso.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <20021024144551.GA9747@gnu.org> <5xsmyvolsh.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5xvg3qyiqp.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5x7kg4dcr7.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035834143 10063 80.91.224.249 (28 Oct 2002 19:42:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 19:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: storm@cua.dk, miles@gnu.org, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, miles@lsi.nec.co.jp, wohler@newt.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, mh-e-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 186FmG-0002bs-00 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:42:20 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 186FqX-0006sv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:46:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 186FlH-0001qg-00; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:41:19 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 186Fkx-0001YX-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:40:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 186Fkt-0001YL-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:40:58 -0500 Original-Received: from maild.telia.com ([194.22.190.101]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 186Fks-0001Ng-00; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:40:55 -0500 Original-Received: from d1o1112.telia.com (d1o1112.telia.com [213.67.192.241]) by maild.telia.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g9SJeZns028706; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:40:48 +0100 (CET) X-Original-Recipient: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from rocksteady (h148n2fls32o1112.telia.com [213.65.65.148]) by d1o1112.telia.com (8.10.2/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g9SJeVg01318; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:40:31 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by rocksteady (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9F76737B88; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:38:37 +0100 (CET) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:19:39 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8855 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8855 Richard Stallman writes: > One interesting question is, are there cases where ending a face name > with -face is actually beneficial? What do people think? I think it's pretty natural to end them with -face. For one thing, it makes it easy to look up with apropos. And take something like `font-lock-keyword-face', what would be a better name? the current name is self-documenting. -- Booting... /vmemacs.el