From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lute Kamstra Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: texinfo.tex change. Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 14:44:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87ekfrmai1.fsf@xs4all.nl> References: <876513nswn.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87u0onmbci.fsf@xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107870060 22119 80.91.229.2 (8 Feb 2005 13:41:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 08 14:40:59 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyVab-0003KW-6x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 14:39:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyVov-00076T-UA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 08:54:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyVoX-00074T-UW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 08:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyVoQ-000719-Sx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 08:53:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyVoQ-00070k-Nx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 08:53:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.109.24.23] (helo=smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CyVYy-0000v4-Gv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 08:37:56 -0500 Original-Received: from pijl (a80-127-67-124.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.67.124]) by smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j18Dbt6e063927; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:37:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Lute.Kamstra@xs4all.nl) Original-Received: from lute by pijl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CyVfi-0001Du-00; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 14:44:54 +0100 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: <87u0onmbci.fsf@xs4all.nl> (Lute Kamstra's message of "Tue, 08 Feb 2005 14:26:37 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Original-Lines: 14 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33084 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33084 Lute Kamstra writes: [...] > We could update man/texinfo.tex (and lispref/texinfo.tex and > lispintro/texinfo.tex) to version 4.8 which defines @LaTeX. There is no lispref/texinfo.tex. Don't we provide texinfo.tex so that a user that doesn't have Texinfo installed can do something like "tex emacs.texi" in the man directory to build the Emacs manual? If so, shouldn't we also provide lispref/texinfo.tex to enable that user to build the Lisp manual in the same way? Lute.