From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [Bug] "You can't edit this part of the Custom buffer"
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:01:51 -0400
Message-ID: <87ejw51rkw.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
References: <EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMIEBOCKAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154113351 11583 80.91.229.2 (28 Jul 2006 19:02:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:02:31 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 28 21:02:29 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G6XaD-00066m-OR
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:01:14 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G6XaD-0001nY-B9
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:01:13 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G6XZy-0001nB-5z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:00:58 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G6XZx-0001mq-JR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:00:57 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G6XZx-0001mn-DN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:00:57 -0400
Original-Received: from [18.19.1.138] (helo=cyd)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G6Xc0-0000Ln-6r
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:03:04 -0400
Original-Received: by cyd (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 8BCF14E2AB; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:01:51 -0400 (EDT)
Original-To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMIEBOCKAA.drew.adams@oracle.com> (Drew
	Adams's message of "Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:29:49 -0700")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57747
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/57747>

>     > Are you doubting the bug report was accurate?
>
>     That's right---like I said, it works for me.
>
> I see. And did you use the Emacs build of the bug report? If not, "it works
> for me" is not enough to shed doubt on the bug report. The bug was reported
> for a March 20 build.
>
> If you tested only with the build just before Richard's fix, then you are
> perhaps doubting that he reproduced the bug, but your test means nothing wrt
> the original bug report, which was for the 3/20 build.

If you like, you can update to the latest CVS sources, revert the
2006-07-12 change, and see if it works for you too.  But in any case,
if the behavior prior to 2006-07-12 is fine, I think we should go back
to that.