"Roland Winkler" writes: > I am trying to develop proced.el in analogy with dired.el. However, > I am always a bit annoyed by the fact that too many functions in > dired.el come with comments instead of docstrings. So I'll convert > these comments into docstrings (unless somebody is really unhappy > about that). Sounds like a good idea to me. One of these days I need to give CL.el and friends some similar treatment. -- | Michael Olson | FSF Associate Member #652 | | http://mwolson.org/ | Hobbies: Lisp, HCoop | | Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, ErBot, DVC, Planner | `-------------------------------------------------------'