From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: elpa.gnu.org packages in an Emacs checkout (was: debbugs.el) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:57:58 -0600 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87ei6wayyh.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> References: <8762sa9770.fsf@gmx.de> <87pqqibr30.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <877hcp1hok.fsf@kslab.red-bean.com> <87d3mhcmyl.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87vd09c5bw.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87sjvcqidp.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298649506 3164 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2011 15:58:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:58:26 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 25 16:58:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt03e-0002nB-2b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:58:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36784 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pt03d-00049b-M3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:58:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41614 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pt03Y-00046o-1Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:58:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt03X-0004ye-67 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:58:11 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:52884) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt03W-0004yV-W7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:58:11 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt03V-0002im-FS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:58:09 +0100 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:58:09 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:58:09 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110014 (No Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+Vo28Q12V7DoGasKz8AnpSzTEQQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136517 Archived-At: On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:47:39 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: >> This is why I suggested the elpa.gnu.org files should simply be in a >> subdirectory of the Emacs trunk but the maintainers preferred they be >> separate. Maybe now, after a few months of offering elpa.gnu.org, it >> can be reevaluated. SM> There is no question that the ELPA archive should be in a different Bzr SM> branch than Emacs. But we should encourage (e.g. by making it very SM> easy) having both checkouts. Is there a way to set it up so a) checking out Emacs from Bazaar gives the elpa.gnu.org (GNU ELPA) code branch as well, and b) changes made in such a checkout propagate back to the GNU ELPA branch? That seems like a lot of magic but Bazaar seems to excel in magic :) If so, the difference is server-side and won't matter to the developers. But otherwise we should revise the instructions for checking out Emacs to make it clear the GNU ELPA code is part of Emacs and should be checked out alongside. Ted