From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: File watch support in autorevert.el Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:09:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87ehhrn1lo.fsf@gmx.de> References: <878v819kok.fsf@gmx.de> <83fw28uj9c.fsf@gnu.org> <8338y7vkyx.fsf@gnu.org> <87libzn4qt.fsf@gmx.de> <83y5fzu3al.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1357920570 28936 80.91.229.3 (11 Jan 2013 16:09:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 11 17:09:47 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TthAs-00075M-H5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:09:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50285 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TthAc-0001Co-HL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:09:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46861) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TthAV-0001Aw-LH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:09:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TthAO-0002As-08 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:09:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:60886) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TthAN-0002AR-Ld for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:09:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.1]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MSFoz-1TWLgT2ulv-00TRxm for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:09:10 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2013 16:09:10 -0000 Original-Received: from p57BB98BB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO detlef.gmx.de) [87.187.152.187] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 11 Jan 2013 17:09:10 +0100 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19iQmsRvXdiMhuKrauS8KopXBdBE05OfZCy3lUKBl iAaoay5Qel+cj8 In-Reply-To: <83y5fzu3al.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:50:42 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156226 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Hmm, as said already I have almost no chance to test it under Windows ... >> I would let this implementation to somebody else. > > So now we will have features which, although equivalent, are only > implemented on the platform of the implementer's choice? If so, what > good is it to have the same feature implemented on different > platforms? It's not "my choice". I simply don't use MS Windows, and so I cannot do anything for MS Windows but adding code w/o any test.