From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.orgmode Subject: Re: org-export raises stringp nil error Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:12:55 +0400 Message-ID: <87ehfqxhzc.fsf@yandex.ru> References: <87ip539io1.fsf@nautilus.nautilus> <87zjye96ph.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vc928kcm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <83sj46z468.fsf@gnu.org> <83obeuyz6u.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362741197 10562 80.91.229.3 (8 Mar 2013 11:13:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 11:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lele@metapensiero.it, joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org, bzg@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, sdl.web@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 08 12:13:37 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UDvF3-0001Ev-GK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:13:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39932 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDvEh-00028E-K3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 06:13:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48889) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDvEa-0001vY-7u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 06:13:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDvEU-00068T-Uo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 06:13:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]:61363) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDvEU-00068I-O0; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 06:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id fe20so1563089lab.29 for ; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:13:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-antivirus :x-antivirus-status; bh=p/xM8gTmcOkWruZzp7YLN60M70230iMtMNaFABAe5vY=; b=r0UhrXgXSV0LBiN5NzGosPTitW0u9GMC8FrL7x9Hkrmx8EPUTkcHcx+feX6oEUgggB In4PXWFE0lTPExV7A3c+8iwrzUV1rpearxS/tnmwJvUkP67mnDCYV6AIgN6CxOmdcDOk TMCLWrPKKYuXV1Uh0xYdwFEHwVJFJ1h3p19tqVRZif1LdK0iD8gdi0QMEZvjCt/1oTVc lJkkz8ue7PyenFGnl9GipBIX6zDSOGOxkKkzxC/V9SScSmtbyvG7htk6TxOZ8srGqEdQ qsadNFyI3k1kTS/Gj3noW1kCYhPkUl9ffeG8ltaxIEo+zkNAEiCXvXQKhwfFkzjFl4u9 WSQQ== X-Received: by 10.112.103.196 with SMTP id fy4mr875006lbb.125.1362741181355; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:13:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from SOL ([178.252.98.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k15sm1541032lbd.6.2013.03.08.03.12.57 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:12:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83obeuyz6u.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:15:53 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130307-3, 08.03.2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157602 gmane.emacs.orgmode:67934 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: joakim@verona.se >> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:15:07 +0100 >> Cc: bzg@gnu.org, lele@metapensiero.it, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, >> Leo Liu , emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> - Emacs "trunk" could be stripped of all but the bare essentials to >> achieve bootstrap. >> - distribution tarballs could be made from trunk+elpa. >> >> Since I dont do releases for Emacs I dont get to have an opinion on the >> matter, but if pressed, I would say this idea has considerable merit. > > It also has at least one demerits: people who track the trunk will not > necessarily use the revisions of packages from elpa that will be > included in Emacs tarballs. That will probably mean longer and more > painful pretests, and some of the advantages of having a publicly > accessible development trunk will be lost. On the other hand, people using older-but-still-supported versions of Emacs will be able to help test the new versions of packages in ELPA. Considering the total Emacs userbase is huge, this could be a great benefit, and hey, if a problem in org-mode is found just before Emacs release, it would either be completely org-mode team's problem (if it's not bundled with Emacs), or Emacs could bundle the last stable version without the regression. As long as Org is in the same tree, doing this kind of trick is much harder.