From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sivaram Neelakantan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: List packages Status column terminology Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:14:32 +0530 Message-ID: <87eh46knzj.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87bnzbi4ti.fsf@gmail.com> <874n527av5.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390013098 19518 80.91.229.3 (18 Jan 2014 02:44:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 02:44:58 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 18 03:45:05 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W4LuC-000784-NK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 03:45:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40972 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4LuC-0007MS-Dc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:45:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41306) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Lu2-0007Ku-2o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:45:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Ltu-0004hI-Or for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:44:54 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60292) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Ltu-0004gr-Hr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:44:46 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Ltr-0006p4-EA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 03:44:43 +0100 Original-Received: from 122.167.108.7 ([122.167.108.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 03:44:43 +0100 Original-Received: from nsivaram.net by 122.167.108.7 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 03:44:43 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 122.167.108.7 User-Mail-Address: nsivaram.net@gmail.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:b/r0bSNUXZuX/6u16TkjJ/1rkUc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168646 Archived-At: On Sat, Jan 18 2014,Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Well, it probably would make sense to change the 'Status' to 'Action' as >> that would be a better reflection of 'list-packages' functionality. > > What "Action" do you propose for "built-in"? And "obsolete"? > Why, "installed" and not show obsolete packages. All built-ins are installed per definition? And obsolete packages, that stumps me. sivaram --